2008
DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181791a79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place of Death Among Older Americans

Abstract: Background-The majority of Americans die in institutions although most prefer to die at home. States vary greatly in their proportion of home deaths. Although individuals' circumstances largely determine where they die, health policies may affect the range of options available to them.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In response to growing budget deficits in many states and strong public demand, the 1999 Olmstead Supreme Court decision required that states expand alternative HCBS programs. Some research during that time period showed that higher HCBS spending was negatively related to the likelihood of nursing home admission (Burr, Mutchler, & Pilcher-Warren, 2002; Muramatsu et al, 2007), to the proportion of residents in nursing homes with low-care needs (Hahn, Thomas, Hyer, Andel, & Meng, 2011; Thomas & Mor, 2013) and positively related to the proportion of people able to die at home (Muramatsu, Hoyem, Yin, & Campbell, 2008). In response, many states adopted initiatives to expand community-based care as an alternative of institutional care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to growing budget deficits in many states and strong public demand, the 1999 Olmstead Supreme Court decision required that states expand alternative HCBS programs. Some research during that time period showed that higher HCBS spending was negatively related to the likelihood of nursing home admission (Burr, Mutchler, & Pilcher-Warren, 2002; Muramatsu et al, 2007), to the proportion of residents in nursing homes with low-care needs (Hahn, Thomas, Hyer, Andel, & Meng, 2011; Thomas & Mor, 2013) and positively related to the proportion of people able to die at home (Muramatsu, Hoyem, Yin, & Campbell, 2008). In response, many states adopted initiatives to expand community-based care as an alternative of institutional care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 However, despite these preferences and better outcomes for care at home compared to other settings, in 2007, only 30% of decedents under age 65 and 24% of decedents 65 or older died at home. 3-6 Even when patients want to die at home, lack of caregiver support, 7 lack of healthcare provider knowledge of preferences, 1 and poor symptom control 8 may result in transfer to sub-acute or acute care settings prior to death. 9,10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, compared to wealthier patients, those with lower incomes are less likely to die at home 7,8 due to poorer access to healthcare, less knowledge of resources, less communication with providers about care preferences, lack of resources to assist with caregiving, and greater symptom burden at the end of life. 3,11,12 Additionally, those with lower incomes are less likely to enroll in hospice, which facilitates dying at home. 13,14 In 2003, approximately 50% of hospice enrollees died at home compared to 25% in the general population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large inter-state variation remains today. Living in a state supportive of HCBS lowers the risk for nursing home admission among seniors (Muramatsu, Hoyem, Yin, & Campbell, 2008; Muramatsu, Yin, Campbell, Hoyem, Jacob, & Ross, 2007). However, whether state HCBS support affects older adults' psychological well-being is virtually unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%