2004
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place Preference Induced by Nucleus Accumbens Amphetamine Is Impaired by Antagonists of ERK or p38 MAP Kinases in Rats.

Abstract: The nucleus accumbens (NAc) plays a role in conditioned place preference (CPP). The authors tested the hypothesis that inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) would inhibit NAc-amphetamine-produced CPP. Results confirmed that NAc amphetamine increased levels of the MAPK extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). In CPP studies, NAc injections (0.5 microl per side) of the ERK inhibitor PD98059 (1.0-2.5 microg) or the p38 kinase inhibitor SB203580 (15-500 ng) dose dependently impaired CPP. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
103
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
14
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that pretreatment with U0126 attenuated the propofol-maintained selfadministration, consistent with several other studies. For example, inhibition of ERK activity by intracerebroventricular pre-treatment with either PD98059 or U0126 decreases morphine-induced place preference [14]; ERK inhibition blocks THC-induced reward properties in the place-preference paradigm [15]; Amphetamine increases the levels of ERK, and NAc injections of the ERK inhibitor PD98059 dose-dependently impair amphetamine-induced place-preference [35]; and overexpressing ERK2 by virusmediated gene transfer increases the preference for environments previously paired with low doses of cocaine, whereas blocking ERK2 activity inhibits this cocaine-induced place conditioning [36]. Therefore, ERK signaling is critical for the downstream regulation of DA signal transmission in the NAc mediating the propofol self-administration and rewarding effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that pretreatment with U0126 attenuated the propofol-maintained selfadministration, consistent with several other studies. For example, inhibition of ERK activity by intracerebroventricular pre-treatment with either PD98059 or U0126 decreases morphine-induced place preference [14]; ERK inhibition blocks THC-induced reward properties in the place-preference paradigm [15]; Amphetamine increases the levels of ERK, and NAc injections of the ERK inhibitor PD98059 dose-dependently impair amphetamine-induced place-preference [35]; and overexpressing ERK2 by virusmediated gene transfer increases the preference for environments previously paired with low doses of cocaine, whereas blocking ERK2 activity inhibits this cocaine-induced place conditioning [36]. Therefore, ERK signaling is critical for the downstream regulation of DA signal transmission in the NAc mediating the propofol self-administration and rewarding effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, pharmacological inhibition of MEK, the upstream activator of the two major ERK isoforms in the brain (ERK1 and ERK2), prevents both hippocampus-and amygdala-dependent memory formation (Atkins et al, 1998;Schafe et al, 1999;Adams and Sweatt, 2002). Pharmacological blockade of the Raf-MEK-ERK cascade also attenuates the development of a conditioned place preference to cocaine, amphetamine or MDMA (Valjent et al, 2000;Salzmann et al, 2003;Gerdjikov et al, 2004) and appears to modulate the development of psychomotor sensitization to cocaine (Pierce et al, 1999;Valjent et al, 2005). In addition, administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs increases ERK activity in several mesocorticolimbic brain regions associated with drug addiction (Valjent et al, 2000(Valjent et al, , 2005Adams et al, 2001; and the induction of immediate early genes (IEGs) in these brain regions is largely attenuated by pharmacological blockade of this pathway (Valjent et al, 2000;Salzmann et al, 2003;Ferguson and Robinson, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether trained mice exhibited a significant conditioned place preference or aversion, preference scores were contrasted using repeated measures ANOVA with the day-factor as the within-groups variable and group-factor as the between-groups variable. This analysis was followed by between-group comparisons, which were completed with a post hoc analysis (LSD) test in SPSS 13.0 (Gerdjikov & Beninger, 2006). All behavioral data were collected from videorecordings was obtained by an investigator blind to the experimental conditions that performed offline manual scoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%