Placebo Effects in Biofeedback and Self‐Perception of Muscle Tension

Pollard, Robert Q.; Katkin, Edward S.

doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb02316.x

Cited by 6 publications

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

EMG biofeedback and discriminative muscle control

Glaros

Hanson²

1990

Biofeedback and Self-Regulation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The awareness model of biofeedback suggests that training teaches new skills or enhances performance at old skills, while the cognitive or feed-forward models suggest that biofeedback brings attention to the response of interest but does not actually increase task skill. In a test of the predictions made by these models, subjects were tested on one or more cross-modal matching tasks, provided brief training, and retested on the task(s). Thirty subjects participated in integer-matching tasks in which they were instructed to produce various levels of frontalis activity corresponding to the levels of a ratio scale. Forty-five subjects participated in a tone-matching task in which they tried to match their frontalis tension to the pitch of a tone. The results indicated that the groups receiving biofeedback training improved at the more difficult integer task and at the tone task. Subjects performed better on the integer tasks than at the tone task. Our findings suggest that an awareness model accounts for changes occurring during biofeedback training. However, an awareness model may be applicable only for tasks of moderate difficulty; for relatively easy tasks, a feed-forward model may be more appropriate. The clinical utility of cross-modal matching tasks is also described.

show abstract

EMG biofeedback and discriminative muscle control

Glaros

Hanson²

1990

Biofeedback and Self-Regulation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The role of EMG awareness in EMG biofeedback learning

Segreto

1995

Biofeedback and Self-Regulation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Underlying most research on biofeedback learning is a theoretical model of the processes involved. The current study tested a prediction from the Awareness Model: High initial EMG awareness should facilitate response control during EMG biofeedback training. Seventy-two undergraduates were assessed for forehead EMG awareness by asking them to produce target responses from 1.0 to 5.0 microV every 15 s for 16 trials. Based on this assessment, two groups (high and low awareness) were trained for 64 trials to produce these target levels with either EMG biofeedback, practice (no feedback), or noncontingent EMG feedback. A transfer task was identical to the initial assessment. During training, the biofeedback group deviated less from target than the practice and noncontingent groups. The biofeedback group was the only group to improve from initial EMG awareness activity. During transfer, only the low awareness biofeedback group remained below initial EMG awareness level. These findings can be interpreted in terms of the Two-Process Model.

show abstract