Placement of an intra-arterial stent-graft for a pseudoaneurysm after pancreatoduodenectomy

Asai, Koji; Watanabe, Masamichi; Miyata, Hiroshi; Saito, Tomoaki; Kodama, Hajime; Enomoto, Toshiyuki; Kiribayashi, Takaharu; Nakamura, Yoichi; Okamoto, Yasushi; Saida, Yoshihisa; Nagao, Jirō; Iijima, Raisuke; Hara, Hidehiko; Nakamura, Masato; Kusachi, Shozo

doi:10.1016/j.pan.2013.07.227

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Overall hospital stays (including readmissions) in their research ranged from 5.010.120 days in the LC-group to 9.001.351 days in the percutaneous PCD group (P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in a different research by Asai et al (16), which also demonstrated substantial differences in surgical time, blood loss, postoperative problems, length of postoperative stay, and overall hospitalization time between the groups. Complications after surgery were more common in the PCD group (20.7%; 6/29) than the LC group (3.1%; 6/196) (P0.0005).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients

Alaubaidi

2023

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To assess which treatment modality, Patients with AC who are at a high risk should have a cholecystectomy performed using or percutaneous catheter drainage. Methodology: Sixty people were included in this study because they got diagnosed with acute calculous cholecystitis. Both the procedure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and percutaneous catheter drainage were offered to them at random. Results: In terms of the need for further surgery, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups as there were 2 (6.7%) who needed re-intervention in laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and 14 (46.7%) in percutaneous catheter drainage group (p=0.001*), recurrent biliary disease as there were 2 (6.7%) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and 17 (56.7%) in percutaneous catheter drainage group (p<0.001*) and total length of hospital stay as the mean of laparoscopic cholecystectomy group was 4.9 (±2.77 SD) while in percutaneous catheter drainage group was 10.67 (±6.62 SD).Conclusion: Cholecystectomy with laparoscopic is favored over percutaneous drainage for high-risk individuals with acute cholecystitis. When compared to percutaneous catheter drainage, laparoscopic cholecystectomy decreased significant complications but did not affect fatality rates.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients

Alaubaidi

2023

ijhs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Placement of an intra-arterial stent-graft for a pseudoaneurysm after pancreatoduodenectomy

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About