2012
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.590537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Placement of effective work-in-progress limits in route-specific unit-based pull systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each pair of consecutive stations, often referred to as cells in the POLCA literature, in the routing of a job has a POLCA card that identifies the two stations. A major difference between POLCA and, for example, kanban systems is that POLCA cards are job anonymous (Riezebos et al [27]; Ziengs et al [36]) while kanban cards are not (Shingo [29]). In this aspect, POLCA cards resemble ConWIP (Constant Work-In-Process) cards.…”
Section: Mechanisms Underpinning a Polca Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each pair of consecutive stations, often referred to as cells in the POLCA literature, in the routing of a job has a POLCA card that identifies the two stations. A major difference between POLCA and, for example, kanban systems is that POLCA cards are job anonymous (Riezebos et al [27]; Ziengs et al [36]) while kanban cards are not (Shingo [29]). In this aspect, POLCA cards resemble ConWIP (Constant Work-In-Process) cards.…”
Section: Mechanisms Underpinning a Polca Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent simulation studies on POLCA (e.g. Germs & Riezebos [12]; Ziengs et al [36]), a simple divergent shop structure was used. However, make-to-order companies that produce a high variety of products often use a functional layout and operate as some form of job shop (e.g.…”
Section: Overview Of Modeled Shop and Job Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study from Cuatrecasas-Arbós [5] in determining the production lead time, it is preferable to correlate a production lead time with the WIP level rather than the process cycle time. Another study from Ziengs [19] examined limiting the WIP level by creating a unit-base pull system to ease the determination of throughput time on the production line.…”
Section: Work-in-progress Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature review for this case study is summarized in Table 1, below.Hereafter, a few issues have been experienced by the authors (Cuatrecasas-Arbós [5], Savino [14], Oladipapo [3], Ziengs [19]) in studying inventory from the actual shop floor production parameter perspective, such as process setting time, machine upload efficiency, process cycle time in the overall process and information flow in actual operation. The papers on VSM application by Lasa [8] and Harwinder [1] show that lean tools initially improve the floor activities.…”
Section: Case Study Gap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unit-based mechanisms, on the other hand, would not quantify the difference in the workload impacts of releasing a unit of a short processing time and a high processing time product into a system. However, load-based mechanisms are generally less used than unit-based mechanisms, because of challenges that have to do with accurate quantification of the load impact of released item units, as well as the complexity of their software and hardware requirements for implementation and execution [12]. As evident in the COBACABANA, for which two methods of representing workload have been reported [4,13], it can be difficult to find a trade-off between requiring many cards to precisely represent different product workload ranges and reducing the number of cards with the implication of a less precise load representation.…”
Section: Review Of Literature On Related Control Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%