1994
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod50.5.1136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Placental Lactogen and Somatotropin: Hormone Binding to the Corpus Luteum and Effects on the Growth and Functions of the Ovary in Heifers1

Abstract: The effects of recombinant bovine placental lactogen (rbPL) and recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) on development of ovarian follicles and CL were tested in heifers. Estrus (day = 0) was synchronized and heifers were treated (Days 0-21) with either saline (control; n = 7), rbST (25 mg/day; n = 6), or rbPL. (50 mg/day; n = 8). Blood was collected daily for analyses of progesterone, estradiol, ST, PL, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I; ultrasound was performed daily for measurement of follicles and CL. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the PCL cows maintained their yield with greater dry matter intake, compared with DOV1 cows, without major adverse consequences for the reproductive system. The endocrine profile of high GH levels may, however, be responsible for the extension of the luteal phase, as GH has been shown to be luteotrophic in vitro (Liebermann & Schams 1994, Wathes et al 1995 and some studies have reported that administration of bovine somatotrophin to lactating cows can prolong the luteal phase (Schemm et al 1990, Gallo & Block 1991, Lucy et al 1994, although this effect was not seen in 1-year-old heifers (Yung et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the PCL cows maintained their yield with greater dry matter intake, compared with DOV1 cows, without major adverse consequences for the reproductive system. The endocrine profile of high GH levels may, however, be responsible for the extension of the luteal phase, as GH has been shown to be luteotrophic in vitro (Liebermann & Schams 1994, Wathes et al 1995 and some studies have reported that administration of bovine somatotrophin to lactating cows can prolong the luteal phase (Schemm et al 1990, Gallo & Block 1991, Lucy et al 1994, although this effect was not seen in 1-year-old heifers (Yung et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also evidence for bGH-R and bPRL-R transcripts in bovine extra-embryonic membranes and in the glandular uterine endometrium, but much lower levels of both receptor mRNAs in the caruncles (Kolle et al 1997). Recombinant bPL (rbPL) treatment increased the size of bovine corpus luteum, increased concentrations of progesterone in plasma, and specifically bound to luteal membranes, whereas the responses of bovine corpus luteum to recombinant bovine GH (rbGH) were much less than to rbPL (Lucy et al 1994a). Bovine corpus luteum and endometrium have a unique mRNA that hybridizes with a cDNA for bGH-R.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bovine corpus luteum and endometrium have a unique mRNA that hybridizes with a cDNA for bGH-R. The giant cells of the bovine corpus luteum have been shown to be rich in GH-R message and to stain positively by immunohistochemistry for the presence of cell surface GH-R (Lucy et al 1993(Lucy et al , 1994a. The administration of rbGH increased both the size of the bovine corpus luteum and progesterone secretion; it also increased the progesterone response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone infusion in bGHtreated animals (Lucy et al 1994b, Adriaens et al 1995.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, to increase yield of transferable embryos, selection of donors with high follicular populations must be considered. On the other hand, size of the follicular population can be manipulated by using recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST), which produces an increase in the number of recruited small follicles (Gong et al, 1993a) and follicular growth after recruitment (De la Sota et al, 1993;Lucy et al, 1994). Pretreatment of the donor with rbST appears to reduce donor superovulatory variability (Gong et al, 1993b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%