2018
DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2018.1430292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Placing Heritage in Entrepreneurial Urbanism: Planning, Conservation and Crisis in Ireland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobilization of heritage narratives for place branding Emphasis on external capitaltourists, investors Increased use of established neoliberal planning tools: 'soft spaces' for governance, flexible approaches for conservation-planning and regulation, market-based tools Diminished capacity for conservation-planning interventions through staff cutbacks Reduced financial resources for heritage protection businesses, helping to promote the city through artisanal/craft products or new cultural activities prevalent in vacant pop-up venues as a means of rebranding the city (Scott, Parkinson, Redmond, & Waldron, 2018). However, heritage-led regeneration as branding also challenges the authenticity of tangible built heritage and conservation practice.…”
Section: Increased Heritage At Risk Through Vacancy and Disrepairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobilization of heritage narratives for place branding Emphasis on external capitaltourists, investors Increased use of established neoliberal planning tools: 'soft spaces' for governance, flexible approaches for conservation-planning and regulation, market-based tools Diminished capacity for conservation-planning interventions through staff cutbacks Reduced financial resources for heritage protection businesses, helping to promote the city through artisanal/craft products or new cultural activities prevalent in vacant pop-up venues as a means of rebranding the city (Scott, Parkinson, Redmond, & Waldron, 2018). However, heritage-led regeneration as branding also challenges the authenticity of tangible built heritage and conservation practice.…”
Section: Increased Heritage At Risk Through Vacancy and Disrepairmentioning
confidence: 99%