2006
DOI: 10.1080/14608940600842268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Placing In-between: Thinking through Architecture in the Construction of Colonial-Modern Identities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of equal symbolic power are the urban landscapes as 'heuristic framework[s] for thinking' studied by Peter Scriver (2006), p. 207) in his exploration of colonialmodern architecture in India, also through the lens of literature. By means of three novels published over time he analyses 'the architectural legacies of the colonial expansion of Europe into the geographical and cultural spaces of the non-West over the past five centuries' (p. 209).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of equal symbolic power are the urban landscapes as 'heuristic framework[s] for thinking' studied by Peter Scriver (2006), p. 207) in his exploration of colonialmodern architecture in India, also through the lens of literature. By means of three novels published over time he analyses 'the architectural legacies of the colonial expansion of Europe into the geographical and cultural spaces of the non-West over the past five centuries' (p. 209).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, although there are clear parallels, the literature on post-socialist urbanism draws surprisingly few connections with the considerable research on post-colonial urbanism. This research explores how the negotiation of cultural boundaries and socio-economic inequalities arising during and after colonial encounters impact practices of architecture, urban planning, and identity (Njoh 2009;Scriver 2006;Stenning and Horschelmann 2008). Similar to Western overseas colonialism, the expansion of Russian/Soviet hegemony across much of Eurasia relied on varying degrees of coercion, co-optation, and collaboration.…”
Section: Avenues and Opportunities For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research has laid bare the ideological imperatives that animate campaigns to (re-)order urban space, especially spaces imbued with particular historical, political, or socio-cultural significance. Simply put, urban landscapes and spaces constitute malleable resources deployed by groups as they continually compete to shape cultural political economy and socio-political relations (Hagen 2010;Jacobs and Merriman 2011;Ribera-Fumaz 2009;Scriver 2006). This is particularly so for capital cites, which according to Denis Cosgrove, "are designed landscapes whose patterns of roads and open spaces, buildings and monuments invariably inscribe foundation myths, public memory, constitutional structures and heroic individuals into an iconography of nationhood" (2002,264).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%