2017
DOI: 10.24017/science.2017.3.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plagiarism Detection Techniques for Arabic Script Languages: A Literature Review

Abstract: Plagiarism is generally defined as literary theft and academic dishonesty. This considered as the serious issue in an academic documents and texts. There are numerous of plagiarism detection techniques have been developed for various natural languages, mainly English. In this paper we investigate and review the plagiarism detection techniques and algorithms which have been developed for Arabic Script Languages (ASL), and providing a literature review of the utilized methods in terms of techniques and outcomes.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reviewed all publications from 2009 to 2017, as their results plagiarism detection techniques widely used for that language. Moreover, Ibrahim et al presented the techniques that used for ASLs based on their review, most techniques used for Arabic language, then Persia and Urdu languages, but there is no publication exist for the Kurdish language [6]. Moreover wide range of research in natural language processing focuses on entities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reviewed all publications from 2009 to 2017, as their results plagiarism detection techniques widely used for that language. Moreover, Ibrahim et al presented the techniques that used for ASLs based on their review, most techniques used for Arabic language, then Persia and Urdu languages, but there is no publication exist for the Kurdish language [6]. Moreover wide range of research in natural language processing focuses on entities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in-depth investigation of cross-language plagiarism detection methods on a new paper published [10]. In these literature works some systems completed for different languages especially English, Arabic, Urdu and so on but there are no works for the Kurdish language [7]. The Kurdish language used Arabic letter after changing some letters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reviewed all publications from 2009 to 2017, as their results plagiarism detection techniques widely used for that language. Moreover, Ibrahim et al presented the techniques that used for ASLs based on their review, most techniques used for Arabic language, then Persia and Urdu languages, but there is no publication exist for the Kurdish language [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%