2012
DOI: 10.3201/eid1801.110597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plague Epidemic in the Kingdom of Naples, 1656–1658

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the confirmation of the cause of death of these individuals from San Leonardo represents an important result because these graves are the first Black Death burials attested in Southern Italy for the 14th century. Another find is dated back to the 1656-1658 epidemic [103]. Additionally, identifying plague victims in San Leonardo highlights that the contamination progressively spread through principal communication routes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the confirmation of the cause of death of these individuals from San Leonardo represents an important result because these graves are the first Black Death burials attested in Southern Italy for the 14th century. Another find is dated back to the 1656-1658 epidemic [103]. Additionally, identifying plague victims in San Leonardo highlights that the contamination progressively spread through principal communication routes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Italy : “1629–1631 Italian plague” and “Naples Plague” Wikipedia articles, Wyman ( 1897 ), Beloch ( 1937 ), Morrison et al ( 1985 ), Scasciamacchia et al ( 2012 ), Tognotti ( 2013 ), White ( 2014 )…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conclusions have been further challenged by the observation of a 3-T homopolymeric tract which differed from the 5-T homopolymeric tract of the Orientalis Y. pestis CO92 type strain in four individuals in the second pandemia site of Manching-Pichl [44]. This was later shown to be CO92 strain specific and not Orientalis biotype specific [42].…”
Section: Palaeomicrobiology Answers Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%