1988
DOI: 10.2190/x7ln-6ukb-53c7-144f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plain Style and Scientific Style: The Influence of the Puritan Plain Style Sermon on Early American Science Writers

Abstract: Early American science writers used the Puritan plain style sermon as a readily available prose model. From the sermon they derived an organization divided into doctrine and uses, a format using sectional divisions and heads, the use of simple language, and a concern for the needs of their audiences. Essays on comets by two early American scientists, Samuel Danforth and John Winthrop, illustrate the sermon's influence. The doctrine and uses organization employed in these essays may be seen as analogous, in som… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hemingway's "minimalist style" is said to correspond to the "technical communicator's goal...: to avoid burdening ... audiences with information they don't need" (Poulsen, 1990, p. 341). Published in a leadingjournal that represents the present-day institution of technical communication, Batschelet's (1988) study of the influence of the Puritan plain-style sermon on early American science writers again reinforces my contention that this institution now accepts as a tacit but foundational premise an equation between scientific and technical writing the copula of which is the idea of plain language. (This article also ignores the fact that several historians ofEnglish prose style have demonstrated connections between Puritanism and the plain style in England well before the era that Batschelet covers [Adolph, 1968;Barber, 1976, p. 77;Fisch, 1952, pp.…”
Section: Motivations For the Studysupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Hemingway's "minimalist style" is said to correspond to the "technical communicator's goal...: to avoid burdening ... audiences with information they don't need" (Poulsen, 1990, p. 341). Published in a leadingjournal that represents the present-day institution of technical communication, Batschelet's (1988) study of the influence of the Puritan plain-style sermon on early American science writers again reinforces my contention that this institution now accepts as a tacit but foundational premise an equation between scientific and technical writing the copula of which is the idea of plain language. (This article also ignores the fact that several historians ofEnglish prose style have demonstrated connections between Puritanism and the plain style in England well before the era that Batschelet covers [Adolph, 1968;Barber, 1976, p. 77;Fisch, 1952, pp.…”
Section: Motivations For the Studysupporting
confidence: 55%