2014
DOI: 10.1177/0739456x14549752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plan Quality Evaluation 1994–2012

Abstract: During the last twenty years, more than forty-five publications have sought to measure and evaluate the quality of plans using content analysis methods. We examine reasons for this growth in the literature and its contributions and limitations. We also examine whether the research methods described in these publications conform to recommended practices in the methodological literature on content analysis to determine whether plan quality researchers are likely to be generating reliable and reproducible plan qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since a comprehensive plan is a process and tool used to guide communities' future land use decisions, seeking to balance development pressure with preservation for long-term economic health and quality of life, it includes all land in its regulatory jurisdiction and also consider all physical developments of the community [30]. Thus, we evaluate each community's comprehensive plan to determine the extent to which local policies contribute to reducing vacancy and vulnerability by districts, following well-established plan content analysis procedures [46]. First, each vacancy related policy is classified by planning districts if the policy reduces/increases the vulnerability and obtains +1/−1 score.…”
Section: Comprehensive Plan Evaluation By Planning Districtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a comprehensive plan is a process and tool used to guide communities' future land use decisions, seeking to balance development pressure with preservation for long-term economic health and quality of life, it includes all land in its regulatory jurisdiction and also consider all physical developments of the community [30]. Thus, we evaluate each community's comprehensive plan to determine the extent to which local policies contribute to reducing vacancy and vulnerability by districts, following well-established plan content analysis procedures [46]. First, each vacancy related policy is classified by planning districts if the policy reduces/increases the vulnerability and obtains +1/−1 score.…”
Section: Comprehensive Plan Evaluation By Planning Districtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planning goals and their impact in terms of costs and benefits were crucial in the selection among planning alternatives (Faludi, 1987;Voogd, 1997;Khakee, 1998). Performance as a concept is also used in the appraisal of the impact of the content and design of a plan on decision-making and governance (Berke & Godschalk, 2009;Lyles & Stevens, 2014). With the shift from exclusive interest on plans to the planning process, performance not only referred to the quality of planned interventions but also about how planning process emulated shared values among participants, community learning of development perspectives and institutional capital (Healey, 1997;Albrechts & Balducci, 2013).…”
Section: Evaluating Strategic Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smart growth has also become a frequent metric in studies of plan quality (Brody, Carrasco, and Highfield 2006;Berke and Godschalk 2009;Lyles and Stevens 2014). Smart growth has also become a frequent metric in studies of plan quality (Brody, Carrasco, and Highfield 2006;Berke and Godschalk 2009;Lyles and Stevens 2014).…”
Section: Conceptualizing the Policy Focus Of Contemporary Local Comprmentioning
confidence: 99%