1992
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(92)90092-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planar functions and related group algebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A bent function is said to be planar if |H| = |N|. Planar functions are extensively studied in [15,16,21,22,25]. When N is a trivial H -module, such a function f is also known as a perfect non-linear function.…”
Section: Theorem 33 (See Galatimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A bent function is said to be planar if |H| = |N|. Planar functions are extensively studied in [15,16,21,22,25]. When N is a trivial H -module, such a function f is also known as a perfect non-linear function.…”
Section: Theorem 33 (See Galatimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If there is an Abelian (5n, 5, 5n, n) RDS in G with (5, n) = 1, n > 1, then there is no integer j such that 5 j ≡ −1 mod exp(G) 5 , the largest divisor of exp(G) which is coprime with 5.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this present paper, we study Abelian relative (pn, p, pn, n) difference sets with p an odd prime not dividing n through a group ring approach. In [9], the authors showed that there is no Abelian (pq, q, pq, p) RDS in Z p × Z 2 q with p, q being two distinct odd primes such that p > q, extending the result in [5]. In [7], the authors showed that there is no Abelian (3pq, 3, 3pq, pq) RDS in Z 2 3 × Z p × Z q with p, q being two distinct primes larger than 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hence, granting the conjecture on finite projective plane, the conjecture on ideal matrix will be settled in the affirmative. Hiramine (1992) proved (in a setting which is somewhat more general) that if there exists a planar function on Z 3p (p a prime number), then p < 5. Hence there does not exist a 3p × 3p ideal matrix…”
Section: Autocorrelation Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%