2016
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planar Minimization Diagrams via Subdivision with Applications to Anisotropic Voronoi Diagrams

Abstract: Let X = {f1, …, fn} be a set of scalar functions of the form fi : ℝ2 → ℝ which satisfy some natural properties. We describe a subdivision algorithm for computing a clustered ε‐isotopic approximation of the minimization diagram of X. By exploiting soft predicates and clustering of Voronoi vertices, our algorithm is the first that can handle arbitrary degeneracies in X, and allow scalar functions which are piecewise smooth, and not necessarily semi‐algebraic. We apply these ideas to the computation of anisotropi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides being of theoretical interest, our smooth quadtree data structure is useful in applications, such as the authors' recent work with Papadopoulou on computing a general class of Voronoi diagrams using subdivision [BPY16]. We have implemented it as part of the Core Library [Cor] 3 .…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides being of theoretical interest, our smooth quadtree data structure is useful in applications, such as the authors' recent work with Papadopoulou on computing a general class of Voronoi diagrams using subdivision [BPY16]. We have implemented it as part of the Core Library [Cor] 3 .…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E.g., users can choose > 0 to be correlated with the uncertainty in the environment and the precision of the robot sensors. By using weighted Voronoi diagrams [4], we can achieve practical planners that have obstacle-dependent clearances (larger clearance for "dangerous" obstacles).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation of φ(C) is hereditary, since φ(C) ⊆ φ(C ), if C is the parent of C. But it is rather costly; given φ(C ) with |φ(C )| = κ, it takes O(κ 2 ) to compute φ(C), since the relative position of C to the bisector of every pair of sites in φ(C ) must be specified. Alternatively, following the work of [22,5], instead of implementing the exact predicate φ(·), we compute an approximate one. We denote by p C , r C the center and the L ∞ -radius of C and define the active set of C as:…”
Section: Subdivision Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where δ C = min s D s (p C ), if p C ∈ P, and 0 otherwise. We now explain how φ approximates φ by adapting [5,Lem.2], where φ appears as a soft version of φ.…”
Section: Subdivision Phasementioning
confidence: 99%