1998
DOI: 10.1142/9789812797988_0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planar Shape Databases with Affine Invariant Search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5.1. Startchik [39] employed intersections between line segments, bi-tangents and cusp tangents as a representation scheme for the object shape. Other techniques using the affine model for comparing [32].…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5.1. Startchik [39] employed intersections between line segments, bi-tangents and cusp tangents as a representation scheme for the object shape. Other techniques using the affine model for comparing [32].…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contour matching under similar or affine transformations (e.g. weak perspective) is a notably easier problem [20,21,22]. For instance, robust affine alignment can be based on shape covariance equalization and Fourier analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an alternative to the projective camera model, an affine model can be used. This has the advantage of simplifying the invariant properties, and proves useful in a wide range of applications [21,28]. Advantages of differential invariants include locality, and the coverage of a relatively large class of shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%