1991 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest
DOI: 10.1109/mwsym.1991.147118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planar transmission lines with finitely thick conductors and lossy substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9 again compares three models for the incremental slot-width used with CF-I to compute the frequency dependent characteristic impedance Z 0 (f, t) for a thin conductor t= 6 μm slot line on the substrate ε r =9.8 with w/h=0.6. All three models follow the SDA results [2] in the low frequency range. However, between 18 GHz-30 GHz none of the models shows the flattened characteristic impedance as provided by the SDA.…”
Section: Characteristic Impedance With Conductor Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 9 again compares three models for the incremental slot-width used with CF-I to compute the frequency dependent characteristic impedance Z 0 (f, t) for a thin conductor t= 6 μm slot line on the substrate ε r =9.8 with w/h=0.6. All three models follow the SDA results [2] in the low frequency range. However, between 18 GHz-30 GHz none of the models shows the flattened characteristic impedance as provided by the SDA.…”
Section: Characteristic Impedance With Conductor Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…14 are computed from the model CF-I discussed earlier. Figure 12a and b compare the conductor loss of a slot-line computed by the present Wheeler's method against the SDA results of Kitazawa et al [2] and Rozzi et al [6]. Two sets of the full-wave results show large variation between themselves.…”
Section: Conductor Lossmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These are summarized in book form . Several analytical and numerical methods—such as conformal mapping methods, quasi‐static Galerkin's method, and full‐wave methods; have been used to get dispersion and losses of the CPW in various geometrical formats . The closed‐form expressions are also reported to compute dispersion in a CPW with zero and with finite conductor thickness .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%