2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plane and vaulted masonry elements strengthened by different techniques – Testing, numerical modeling and nonlinear analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 8 shows the destroyed reference specimen. The same observation was noted by researchers [16]. Graph for the beam with 0% fibre addition or the reference beam is not shown in Fig.…”
Section: Test Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 8 shows the destroyed reference specimen. The same observation was noted by researchers [16]. Graph for the beam with 0% fibre addition or the reference beam is not shown in Fig.…”
Section: Test Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…New researches now tilt in introducing cementitious composites to compete with fibrous composites, which reduce reinforcing percentages and reduce the percentages of fibre additions [15]. Research has also been carried out to validate the experimented and analytical results of using different techniques for retrofitting purposes [16]. The clear difference between fibrous composites and engineered cementitious composites (ECC) can be said as ECC's are part of ultra-ductile composites families, which sustain higher load capabilities, tensile capabilities deflection capabilities with very low volume addition of fibres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%