2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-map.2019.0036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plane wave compensation technique for multiple‐input multiple‐output over‐the‐air testing in small multi‐probe anechoic chamber

Abstract: Multiple‐input multiple‐output (MIMO) over‐the‐air (OTA) testing is often executed in multi‐probe anechoic chamber (MPAC), the size of which is generally large enough so that the waves radiated from the probes can be considered plane waves in test area. The physical dimension of test setups is a key cost factor. In order to save laboratory space and reduce the cost, a compensation technique for spherical waves synthesising plane waves is proposed, which can be applied in small anechoic chamber. The object is t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) Probe Selection Method: Many probe selection algorithms have been proposed for the conventional twodimensional (2-D) MAPC setup and are mainly for stationary channel emulation [31] [32]. The common challenge of them lies in the computational complexity of emulating the dynamic propagations.…”
Section: Probe Selection and Weighting Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2) Probe Selection Method: Many probe selection algorithms have been proposed for the conventional twodimensional (2-D) MAPC setup and are mainly for stationary channel emulation [31] [32]. The common challenge of them lies in the computational complexity of emulating the dynamic propagations.…”
Section: Probe Selection and Weighting Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common challenge of them lies in the computational complexity of emulating the dynamic propagations. For instance, the multi-shot algorithm [32] demands multiple high-dimensional convex optimizations due to a large number of available probes, and the PSO algorithm [31] requires even more computing time. [37] proposed a forward allocation (FA) algorithm based on the orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) principle [38].…”
Section: Probe Selection and Weighting Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The algorithm combinations are shown in Table. I, where the particle swarm optimization (PSO) [33] is run several times to avoid local optima, and the probe location set, minimizing the weighted root mean square (RMS) spatial correlation error [11], is set to be the final location. The metric of PAS similarity is defined in [11].…”
Section: A Simulation Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic principle of PWG is to coherently synthesize the plane wave field in the quiet zone (QZ) via properly allocating excitations for the contained antennas. Various methodologies, e.g., in [6][7][8][9][10][11][12], have been developed to determine the optimal locations and excitations of PWG antennas for a highquality and cost-effective plane wave synthesis. For example, a systematic guideline on the PWG geometrical design and the stability of the solution are studied in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%