2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt1968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planetary influences on photometric variations of the extreme helium subdwarf KIC 10449976

Abstract: We propose that the unstable 3.9 day photometric periodicity of the hot subdwarf (sdO) KIC 10449976 results from a tidally locked planet that is heated to ∼ 5000 K by the UV radiation from the hot sdO star. Although the bolometric radiation from the planet is very small relative to that of the star, in the visible band the planet contributes ∼ 0.07% of the light, sufficient to explain the observed periodic behavior. In our proposed scenario the stochastic variations in period and light amplitude are attributed… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radial-velocity measurements over a 5 d time-scale show an upper variability limit of ≈ 50 ± 20 km s −1 . The origin of this modulation remains to be confirmed; Bear & Soker (2014) argue for reflection from a weather-affected planet but fail to show how such a model can lose phase coherence over an interval of 160 or more orbits. Follow-up observations are yet to be carried out.…”
Section: Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Radial-velocity measurements over a 5 d time-scale show an upper variability limit of ≈ 50 ± 20 km s −1 . The origin of this modulation remains to be confirmed; Bear & Soker (2014) argue for reflection from a weather-affected planet but fail to show how such a model can lose phase coherence over an interval of 160 or more orbits. Follow-up observations are yet to be carried out.…”
Section: Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The mechanisms that are responsible for the amplitude variations may be attributed to either intrinsic or external reasons. The latter includes the tidal effect due to a component star, like an interesting example given by Bear & Soker (2014). In this assumption, amplitude variations should be synchronized with the orbital motion.…”
Section: Amplitude Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplitude and/or frequency variations have been found among nearly all types of nonstochastically excited pulsating variables: δ Sct (Breger et al 2012, Breger & Pamyatnykh 2006, Bowman & Kurtz 2014; γ Dor (Rostopchina et al 2013); β Cep (Pigulski & Pojmanski 2008), roAp (Balona et al 2013, Medupe et al 2015; classical pulsators such as high-amplitude δ Sct stars (Zhou & Jiang 2011, Khokhuntod et al 2011, Cepheids (Engle 2015), RR Lyrae (Chadid & Preston 2013), Miras and yellow supergiants (Percy & Yook 2014, Percy & Khatu 2014; white dwarfs (DBV; Handler et al 2003 and DAV;Bell et al 2015); GW Vir stars (Vauclair et al 2012), sdB stars (Kilkenny 2010, Langfellner et al 2012), and an extreme helium subdwarf (Bear & Soker 2014).…”
Section: Causes Of Amplitude/frequency Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%