Treatise on Geophysics 2007
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044452748-6.00159-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planetary Magnetism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 208 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have demonstrated that in the equatorial zone, the low‐altitude magnetic field estimated from the loss cone size exceeds the model magnetic field, up to a factor of ~2, which is in agreement with direct magnetic field measurements [ Bolton et al , ]. Although only results from the VIP4 model have been shown here, the same conclusion can be derived from VIT4 [ Connerney , ] and VIPAL [ Hess et al , ] models, which predict similar loss cone sizes as the VIP4 model. For high‐latitude measurements (in the northern hemisphere), on the other hand, we did not find any reliable difference between the model loss cone size and the loss cone estimated from plasma data, which indicates no significant magnetic field anomaly at higher latitudes for this particular longitudinal pass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have demonstrated that in the equatorial zone, the low‐altitude magnetic field estimated from the loss cone size exceeds the model magnetic field, up to a factor of ~2, which is in agreement with direct magnetic field measurements [ Bolton et al , ]. Although only results from the VIP4 model have been shown here, the same conclusion can be derived from VIT4 [ Connerney , ] and VIPAL [ Hess et al , ] models, which predict similar loss cone sizes as the VIP4 model. For high‐latitude measurements (in the northern hemisphere), on the other hand, we did not find any reliable difference between the model loss cone size and the loss cone estimated from plasma data, which indicates no significant magnetic field anomaly at higher latitudes for this particular longitudinal pass.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Such models can be improved by using additional constraints from aurora emission measurements. For instance, the region of the localized auroral emission associated with Io should be conjugated along the magnetic field line to the known location of Io's orbit [Connerney et al, 1998;Connerney, 2007;Hess et al, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. (a and b) A comparison of the magnetic energy spectra per spherical harmonic degree and order m for the three different Jupiter field models VIP4 [Connerney et al, 1998], VIT4 [Connerney, 2007], and Ridley [Ridley, 2012] with the time-averaged spectrum of the numerical simulation. The thick black lines in Figure 3a illustrate the predicted noise level for the Juno magnetometer.…”
Section: Gastine Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spacecraft data allow to model the Jovian magnetic field up to spherical harmonic degree and order of 4-5 [Connerney et al, 1998;Connerney, 2007;Hess et al, 2011]. The observations reveal that the Jovian magnetic field is dominated by a tilted dipole with an Earth-like inclination angle around 10 • and is about an order of magnitude stronger than the geomagnetic field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] Many studies of the magnetic mapping of Io to the planet and its comparison with the positions of Io's footprints observed in UV and Infrared have been performed [Connerney et al, 1998;Grodent et al, 2008a;Bonfond et al, 2009], which have led to the determination of new internal magnetic field models [Connerney et al, 1998;Connerney, 2007;Grodent et al, 2008a]. However, none of these models allowed a correct longitudinal mapping of the Io footprints: Studies by Bonfond et al [2009] in the UV and by Hess et al [2010a] in radio showed a large (up to 10°) longitude difference between the predicted and observed positions of the Io footprints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%