1976
DOI: 10.1086/129987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planetary nebulae survey and outlook

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He also lists four objects of the "giant halo" type NGC 6543, NGC 6826, NGC 6891, and IC 4593) to which Terzian (1980) added two more (He 2-111 and NGC 6853), but did not include, NGC 6826 in the list of triple-shell objects and quotes only the two listed by Kaler. The problem of multiple-shell formation has been addressed by Aller (1976) and by Mathews (1978), and the dynamics of envelopes have been treated by Wentzel (1976).…”
Section: Observations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He also lists four objects of the "giant halo" type NGC 6543, NGC 6826, NGC 6891, and IC 4593) to which Terzian (1980) added two more (He 2-111 and NGC 6853), but did not include, NGC 6826 in the list of triple-shell objects and quotes only the two listed by Kaler. The problem of multiple-shell formation has been addressed by Aller (1976) and by Mathews (1978), and the dynamics of envelopes have been treated by Wentzel (1976).…”
Section: Observations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nebula exhibits very weak hydrogen lines with the Ha much weaker than (Aller 1976). Finally, the weakness of the hydrogen lines relative to [O III] suggest a moderate excitation in agreement with Doroshenko and Kolotilov (1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…1, in the Catalog of Perek and Kohoutek (1967) is frequently misidentified as NGC 2474/75. The misidentification originated in a paper by Jones and Emberson (1939) and has occurred subsequently in many references (Perek and Kohoutek 1967;Gurzadyan 1969;Aller 1970;Higgs 1971;Doroshenko and Kolotilov 1973). The misidentification was not made in a photograph of 164 + 31?1 given by Minkowski and Aller (1954).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%