2013
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2013.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planetary (Rossby) waves and inertia–gravity (Poincaré) waves in a barotropic ocean over a sphere

Abstract: The construction of approximate Schrödinger eigenvalue equations for planetary (Rossby) waves and for inertia–gravity (Poincaré) waves on an ocean-covered rotating sphere yields highly accurate estimates of the phase speeds and meridional variation of these waves. The results are applicable to fast rotating spheres such as Earth where the speed of barotropic gravity waves is smaller than twice the tangential speed on the equator of the rotating sphere. The implication of these new results is that the phase spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6.3 (the figures in this subsection were reproduced from Paldor et al (2013)) clearly demonstrate the accuracy of the analytical estimates of E n that were formally derived in (6.16) only for n → ∞ but seem to be accurate even for n = 5, i.e., when αn 2 = 1.25, which is only marginally larger than 1. 6.3 (the figures in this subsection were reproduced from Paldor et al (2013)) clearly demonstrate the accuracy of the analytical estimates of E n that were formally derived in (6.16) only for n → ∞ but seem to be accurate even for n = 5, i.e., when αn 2 = 1.25, which is only marginally larger than 1.…”
Section: Dispersion Relation Of Planetary Wavessupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6.3 (the figures in this subsection were reproduced from Paldor et al (2013)) clearly demonstrate the accuracy of the analytical estimates of E n that were formally derived in (6.16) only for n → ∞ but seem to be accurate even for n = 5, i.e., when αn 2 = 1.25, which is only marginally larger than 1. 6.3 (the figures in this subsection were reproduced from Paldor et al (2013)) clearly demonstrate the accuracy of the analytical estimates of E n that were formally derived in (6.16) only for n → ∞ but seem to be accurate even for n = 5, i.e., when αn 2 = 1.25, which is only marginally larger than 1.…”
Section: Dispersion Relation Of Planetary Wavessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…6.1 for α = 0.01 are very close Fig. (6.2) when αn 2 is not small follows the method described in Paldor et al (2013). The approximations of U 1 ð/Þ þ aU 2 ð/Þ (red dashed line) by U 1 ð/Þ (thin solid blue line) are not accurate near the poles.…”
Section: ð6:8þmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For comparison, the frequencies predicted by Haurwitz () (for the value of gH used here) are superimposed on the figure (dashed‐lines). Note that, while the frequencies predicted by Haurwitz () are indistinguishable from those predicted for Rossby waves by Paldor et al () (except for n = 1, k = 1,2), the eigenfunctions predicted by the two theories are fundamentally different. In particular, the solutions obtained by Paldor et al () include the small but significant divergence field which is completely missing from the Haurwitz solutions.…”
Section: The Analytic Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, as is clearly demonstrated in this work, initial wave modes based on the analytic solutions obtained by Paldor et al () are accurately preserved for at least 100 wave periods, compared to only O (1) for initial Rossby–Haurwitz waves. In particular, except for small round‐off errors in the initial conditions, the error in the solution in the first 100 wave periods results mainly from the numerical scheme being used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%