A survey for planktonic sea louse larvae was carried out in Loch Shieldaig, Scotland, between 2002 and2006, and spanned 2 successive production cycles (Cycles 1 and 2) at a local Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. farm. The vast majority of the caligid copepodids recovered were Lepeophtheirus salmonis; however, the methodology was unable to determine the species of the caligid nauplii. Greatest densities of nauplii were found at the sampling station adjacent to the salmon farm, and larval densities were low during the fallow period of both cycles. Peaks in nauplius densities occurred around the same time in the 2 cycles, but the peaks were significantly lower during Cycle 2 than Cycle 1. Lepeophtheirus salmonis copepodid densities varied temporally, but not spatially. During most of Cycle 2, copepodid densities were significantly lower than those recovered during Cycle 1. Numbers of gravid L. salmonis at the local salmon farm correlated significantly with densities of louse nauplii and L. salmonis copepodids in the water at time lags of 0 and 1 wk, and 1 and 2 wk, respectively. This survey demonstrated a reduction in densities of L. salmonis larvae in the plankton (an indication of L. salmonis infectious pressure) between the 2 cycles and indicated that the farm was an important source of L. salmonis larvae. The application of anti-louse treatments using emamectin benzoate reduced the numbers of gravid L. salmonis at the farm, and this was the main factor influencing the apparent reduction in L. salmonis infectious pressure in the loch between cycles.
KEY WORDS: Lepeophtheirus salmonis 路 Sea lice 路 Larvae 路 Salmon farm 路 Scotland
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherDis Aquat Org 81: [109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117] 2008 duration of each stage of development is strongly dependent on temperature (Johnson & Albright 1991a). Under average sea surface temperatures in Loch Torridon (around 10掳C), L. salmonis nauplii and copepodids would last approximately 3 and 8 d, respectively (Johnson & Albright 1991a), but may become less capable of finding a host after just a few days as finite energy reserves dwindle (Tucker et al. 2000).Few published accounts have described the behaviour of Lepeophtheirus salmonis larvae in the wild. Costelloe et al. (1998a,b) frequently recovered L. salmonis larvae near salmon farms in Ireland. They suggested that most of these larvae were probably of farm origin and that intermittent pulses of L. salmonis larvae that occurred near river mouths were probably of wild origin. A study in Loch Shieldaig, Scotland (Penston et al. 2008), suggested that the majority of louse larvae recovered near a salmon farm were the progeny of L. salmonis on farmed salmon. In contrast to Costelloe et al. (1998a,b), who concluded that farms only influence L. salmonis populations in their immediate environs, Penston et al. (2008) suggested that L. salmonis larvae can have a widespread effect in the surrounding waters.As with most salmon farms in Scotl...