2014
DOI: 10.1177/0165025414531095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planned missing data designs with small sample sizes: How small is too small?

Abstract: Utilizing planned missing data (PMD) designs (ex. 3-form surveys) enables researchers to ask participants fewer questions during the data collection process. An important question, however, is just how few participants are needed to effectively employ planned missing data designs in research studies. This article explores this question by using simulated three-form planned missing data to assess analytic model convergence, parameter estimate bias, standard error bias, mean squared error (MSE), and relative eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Missing data were handled using Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML) while fitting confirmatory factor analyses and structural equation models. FIML has been shown to perform better at smaller sample sizes than multiple imputation (Jia et al 2014). The Little MCAR test conducted using R package BaylorEdPsych showed that the data were missing completely at random (MCAR), X 2 (1913) = 1196.204, p = .09.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Missing data were handled using Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML) while fitting confirmatory factor analyses and structural equation models. FIML has been shown to perform better at smaller sample sizes than multiple imputation (Jia et al 2014). The Little MCAR test conducted using R package BaylorEdPsych showed that the data were missing completely at random (MCAR), X 2 (1913) = 1196.204, p = .09.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies (e.g., Jorgensen, Schoemann, McPherson, Rhemtulla, Wu, & Little, 2013;Jia, Moore, Kinai, Crowe, GROWTH CURVE PM DESIGNS 6 Schoemann, & Little, 2013) have studied the performance of item-level missingness by imposing the 3-form design at each time point in longitudinal panel models, where the predictive relations between constructs over time are of interest (e.g., longitudinal mediation). To our knowledge no studies have examined the effect of item-level planned missingness in the context of latent growth curve models.…”
Section: Item-level Planned Missingnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For longitudinal studies, using a random assignment of form to participant at each measurement occasion also enhances the power of this design. For a detailed simulation studies on the use of the three-form design for longitudinal research, see Jorgensen et al (2014) and Jia et al (2014).…”
Section: Planned Missing Data Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%