2017
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2017.2721551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning and Control for Autonomous Excavation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results shown in this article are compared to our previous work in simulation [14], Shao et al [26] and Maeda et al [11]. In our simulation work, a mean error of 0.035m and 0.044m for two different shapes was achieved.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 49%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results shown in this article are compared to our previous work in simulation [14], Shao et al [26] and Maeda et al [11]. In our simulation work, a mean error of 0.035m and 0.044m for two different shapes was achieved.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 49%
“…7. First, a suitable point of attack for digging, using the excavation planner proposed in previous work [14], is found. The trajectory planner, as shown in Section IV, subsequently plans an environment collision-free trajectory from the current location of the bucket to the excavation point.…”
Section: Autonomous Excavationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No.19-00320 [DOI:10.1299/transjsme.19-00320] 6 ( 2015) / (Jud et al, 2017) Fig. 1 Three types of digging for soft, hard and the mixture of soft and hard soils.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%