LTE Backhaul 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118924655.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning and Optimizing Mobile Backhaul for LTE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Packet loss: In most cases and as Equation 7assumes, packet loss in the backhaul network is generally negligible. This owes to the fact that, in commercial deployments, backhaul link dimensioning is done in such a way that the peak data rate or at least the average data rate of the cell is supported [34]. After all, if the backhaul link limits the cell data rate, there would be no point for the operator to invest in large frequency spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Packet loss: In most cases and as Equation 7assumes, packet loss in the backhaul network is generally negligible. This owes to the fact that, in commercial deployments, backhaul link dimensioning is done in such a way that the peak data rate or at least the average data rate of the cell is supported [34]. After all, if the backhaul link limits the cell data rate, there would be no point for the operator to invest in large frequency spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to detail the three reasons that can prevent the flow from reaching this expected throughput: (1) the flow has a low demand (e.g., Web browsing flow); (2) the capacity of the backhaul is less than the current radio capacity allocated to the UE; (3) one or several concurrent data traffic (most likely unintercepted) exceed the capacity of the backhaul link. Suppose we are using a sheer download TCP flow, in this case we can eliminate (1) but also (2) since this condition is never met in commercial networks [34]. Likewise, the likelihood of observing (3) is close to zero in case of Constant-Bit-Rate (CBR) UDP flows such as Voice over IP (VoIP) traffic since their requirements in terms of bandwidth are very low (e.g., from 64 to few hundreds 𝑘𝑏𝑝𝑠 [41]).…”
Section: Experimentation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Packet loss: In most cases and as Equation 5 assumes, packet loss in the backhaul network is generally negligible. This owes to the fact that, in commercial deployments, backhaul link dimensioning is done in such a way that the peak data rate or at least the average data rate of the cell is supported [21]. After all, if the backhaul link limits the cell data rate, there would be no point for the operator to invest in large frequency spectrum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BH transports data between the aggregation point and the SCs, but it must also exchange control signals [119]. Let us characterize the signaling between the distributed SC b and the CN by its arrival rate, denoted by λ I b , and the average signaling packet size d I (i.e., the mean size of the signaling packets is assumed to be equal in all distributed SCs).…”
Section: Backhaul Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only loose upper and lower bounds for the performance metrics are known for G/G/1 queueing systems (i.e., general packet arrival and size distributions). Thus, for the sake of simplicity and according to [119],…”
Section: Backhaul Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%