Planning for resilient collaboration at a new petroleum installation – A case study of a coaching approach

Skjerve, Ann Britt; Kaarstad, Magnhild; Størseth, Fred; Wærø, Irene; Grøtan, Tor Olav

doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.006

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous research has explored different types of organizational practices promoting increased levels of safety performance (e.g. Allen et al, 2010;Nesheim and Gressgård, 2014;Skjerve et al, 2011;Størseth and Tinmannsvik, 2011). Some research explores after-action reviews and learning as important organizational safety management practices (Allen et al, 2010: Størseth andTinmannsvik, 2011).…”

Section: Complementary Explanation Of Unsafe Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

Social influence and safe behavior in manufacturing

Hald

2018

Safety Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Complementary Explanation Of Unsafe Behaviormentioning

confidence: 99%

Social influence and safe behavior in manufacturing

Hald

2018

Safety Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As we saw in the previous section, Andersen and Aamnes Mostue [38] regarded the introduction of integrated operations (IO) as capable of a vast increase in the complexity of the entire off-shore drilling system at large (including a wide range of stakeholders). Also talking about IO and the changing oil and gas industry in Norway, Skjerve et al [52] point to 'resilient collaboration' as a new necessary manner of interacting in this complex and risky industry: "resilient collaboration, i.e., collaboration that is sufficiently robust and flexible to work efficiently and safely across the various operational states". Similarly, Tveiten et al [39] locate complexity and risk in the increased distribution of oil and gas systems.…”

Section: Riskmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These studies typically construct the object of resilience based on Hollnagel's definitions that emphasise resilience as the ability to adapt or absorb disturbance, disruptions and change [39,42,52,53,60,61,70,71]. Such disturbance is thus central in many writings.…”

Section: Emphasising the Disturbance Or Stressmentioning

confidence: 99%

On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: A literature review

Bergström

Winsen

Henriqson

2015

Reliability Engineering & System Safety

216

124

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resilience is becoming a prevalent agenda in safety research and organisational practice. In this study we examine how the peer-reviewed safety science literature (a) formulates the rationale behind the study of resilience; (b) constructs resilience as a scientific object; and (c) constructs and locates the resilient subject. The results suggest that resilience engineering scholars typically motivate the need for their studies by referring to the inherent complexities of modern sociotechnical systems; complexities that make these systems inherently risky. The object of resilience then becomes the capacity to adapt to such emerging risks in order to guarantee the success of the inherently risky system. In the material reviewed, the subject of resilience is typically the individual, either at the sharp end or at higher managerial levels. The individual is called-upon to adapt in the face of risk to secure the continuous performance of the system. Based on the results from how resilience has been introduced in safety sciences we raise three ethical questions for the field to address: (1) should resilience be seen as people thriving despite of, or because of, risk?; (2) should resilience theory form a basis for moral judgement?; and finally (3) how much should resilience be approached as a trait of the individual?

show abstract

“…Resilience engineering. System and individual Petrochemical plant Resilience as an outcome Resilience promoting safety Skjerve et al (2012) Empirical Qualitative It investigates the potential of a coaching approach in promoting reflection about resilient collaboration. System and individual Production Resilience capabilities Resilience promoting safety Thorogood (2013) Conceptual Resilience as a characteristic of high reliability organizations (HRO).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In such studies, the individual can be observed through different perspectives: collaboration, relationship, anxiety development and individual commitment. Skjerve et al (2012) investigate the contribution of coaching in facilitating reflection about resilient collaboration. Reknes et al, 2018 looks at the individual hardiness in the context of bullying-anxiety relations in an oil and gas company in Norway.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Organizational resilience in the oil and gas industry: A scoping review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Highlights An optimistic perspective on the concept of resilience in the oil & gas industry. Resilience presented as an analytical concept rather than guiding existing practices. Integrated operations has raised questions about system resilience. Research on resilience in oil and industry rarely describes adaptive processes. There is a need for research on resilience beyond safety concerns.

show abstract

Planning for resilient collaboration at a new petroleum installation – A case study of a coaching approach

Cited by 11 publications

References 5 publications

Social influence and safe behavior in manufacturing

Social influence and safe behavior in manufacturing

On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety: A literature review

Organizational resilience in the oil and gas industry: A scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About