2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning for sustainable stakeholder engagement based on the assessment of conflicting interests in projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if not done, it can put organisations in moral dilemmas for accountability. The study by Bahadorestani et al (2020), which provided a link to using a theoretical framework based on stakeholder theory, confirms the significant role of stakeholders in assessing the project performance. However, the performance assessment lacks strategic and sustainable focus means they are more concerned with the short-term as stakeholders are not fully engaged.…”
Section: Assessment Of Performance On Short Term Basismentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, if not done, it can put organisations in moral dilemmas for accountability. The study by Bahadorestani et al (2020), which provided a link to using a theoretical framework based on stakeholder theory, confirms the significant role of stakeholders in assessing the project performance. However, the performance assessment lacks strategic and sustainable focus means they are more concerned with the short-term as stakeholders are not fully engaged.…”
Section: Assessment Of Performance On Short Term Basismentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Existing literature is unanimous regarding the benefits of public and stakeholder engagement in assessing sustainability projects. Such engagement, when conducted in an open and participatory manner, enables systematically ranking the potential conflicts and considering and combining multiple viewpoints of stakeholders (Bahadorestani et al ., 2020), allows sensitivity to issues of values, plurality and local knowledge (Brown, 2009).…”
Section: Accounting Technologies For a Climate‐friendly Stimulus Packagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stakeholders with high salience will be given additional attention, and, in the case of conflicting interests between stakeholders, the project values come first [60]. This approach can also be defined as "absolute attention to project values" [61], given that stakeholders are valued according to project contribution, and (2) the management for stakeholders approach, which allows managers to treat stakeholders based on their rights, and not exclusively by the values they contribute to the specific project. Identified also as an approach that gives "absolute attention to stakeholders' values" [61], it allows stakeholders to draw the attention of managers based on the interest they have in the project [62].…”
Section: Stakeholder Influence Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can also be defined as "absolute attention to project values" [61], given that stakeholders are valued according to project contribution, and (2) the management for stakeholders approach, which allows managers to treat stakeholders based on their rights, and not exclusively by the values they contribute to the specific project. Identified also as an approach that gives "absolute attention to stakeholders' values" [61], it allows stakeholders to draw the attention of managers based on the interest they have in the project [62]. The management for stakeholders approach means that managers should welcome all stakeholders and treat them equally, whether they have the potential to harm or help the project [25].…”
Section: Stakeholder Influence Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%