1999
DOI: 10.1518/001872099779577273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established

Abstract: Critical decisions are made every day by teams of individuals who must coordinate their activities to achieve effectiveness. Researchers recently suggested that a shared mental model (SMM) among team members may help them to make successful decisions. Several avenues for developing SMMs in teams exist, one of which is planning. We explored the relationship between team planning, SMMs, and coordinated team decision making and performance. Results indicated that effective planning increased the SMM among team me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
426
2
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 532 publications
(442 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
10
426
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Levels: Because local cognitive styles prefer concrete detail in their work, whereas global cognitive styles prefer abstract thinking, and remote work elevates ambiguity, people with global cognitive styles will have greater commitment to working with tacit knowledge than people with local cognitive styles. In addition, because the nature of virtual collaboration involves heightened ambiguity from a traditional office setting, these differences are surmised to disproportionately increase the cognitive costs of information exchange for locals during virtual collaboration [19] [20]. Thus, people with global cognitive styles will have greater commitment to manage tacit knowledge than people with local cognitive styles.…”
Section: A Cognitive Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels: Because local cognitive styles prefer concrete detail in their work, whereas global cognitive styles prefer abstract thinking, and remote work elevates ambiguity, people with global cognitive styles will have greater commitment to working with tacit knowledge than people with local cognitive styles. In addition, because the nature of virtual collaboration involves heightened ambiguity from a traditional office setting, these differences are surmised to disproportionately increase the cognitive costs of information exchange for locals during virtual collaboration [19] [20]. Thus, people with global cognitive styles will have greater commitment to manage tacit knowledge than people with local cognitive styles.…”
Section: A Cognitive Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be clear that in designing a tool to improve coordinated performance and interaction in virtual environments the "team" aspect of organization and interaction is vital. Over the past several decades, tremendous resources have been (Stout, et al, 1999). It is widely believed that the SMM is the construct that allows team members to anticipate each other's information requirements and implicitly communicate in times of stress.…”
Section: Teamwork and Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They review the materials, generate a course of action, and identify what they believe will be salient clues and cues in achieving their goals. This aspect of team performance is normally identified as team experience (Stout, et al, 1999) and generally is tied to shared experience and practice in a known environment. In this case, the environment and the team were unfamiliar to the participants and story generation Recognition primed decision (RPD) theory (Klein, et al, 1989) (Figure 5.1) recognized that decision-making consisted of three general levels.…”
Section: Story Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Research has shown that when team members possess similar mental models their team performance is enhanced (Stout, Cannon-Bowers, Salas, & Milanovich, 1999) and when teams are not allowed to generate shared mental models they perform significantly worse than teams with shared mental models (Bolstad & Endsley, 1999). Research has shown that communication increases team effectiveness by helping teams form shared SA and shared mental models (Brannick, Roach, & Salas, 1993;Williges, Johnston, & Briggs, 1966).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%