2015
DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2014.2362550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning Water Resources Allocation Under Multiple Uncertainties Through a Generalized Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Method

Abstract: In this study, a generalized fuzzy two-stage stochastic programming (GFTSP) method is developed for planning water resources management systems under uncertainty. The developed GFTSP method can deal with uncertainties expressed as probability distributions, fuzzy sets, as well as fuzzy random variables. With the aid of a robust stepwise interactive algorithm, solutions for GFTSP can be generated by solving a set of deterministic submodels. Furthermore, the possibility information (expressed as fuzzy membership… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of μ à (x) va-ries between 0 and 1, indicating the possibility of an element x belonging to Ã. μ à (x) = 1 means that x definitely belongs to the fuzzy set (Ã), while μ à (x) = 0 denotes that x does not belong to Ã. The closer μ à (x) is to 1, the more likely that x belongs to Ã; conversely, the closer μ à (x) is to 0, the less likely x belongs to à (Zimmermann, 1985;Lai andHwang, 1992, Li andFan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Fuzzy Stochastic Chance Constraint Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of μ à (x) va-ries between 0 and 1, indicating the possibility of an element x belonging to Ã. μ à (x) = 1 means that x definitely belongs to the fuzzy set (Ã), while μ à (x) = 0 denotes that x does not belong to Ã. The closer μ à (x) is to 1, the more likely that x belongs to Ã; conversely, the closer μ à (x) is to 0, the less likely x belongs to à (Zimmermann, 1985;Lai andHwang, 1992, Li andFan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Fuzzy Stochastic Chance Constraint Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, many uncertain analysis approaches were developed for dealing with watershed-scale water resource management issues, including stochastic mathematical programming (SMP) [3][4][5][6][7], fuzzy mathematical programming (FMP) [8][9][10][11] and interval mathematical programming (IMP) [12,13], as well as their combinations [14][15][16][17][18]. Among them, stochastic chance-constrained programming (SCCP) was extensively applied in water resource management due to its capacity in evaluating the trade-offs between realization of system objectives and satisfaction degrees of model constraints [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, there have been serious contradictions between water supply and demand, water shortage and water pollution, as well as the competition among water users [8]. In addition, water resources systems can be complex with uncertainties which may exist in technical, social, environmental, political, and financial factors [9,10]. For example, there are serious water resource problems in the eastern part of Handa, China: (a) the distribution of water resources is uneven since the main surface water of Handan (Yuecheng and Dongwushi reservoirs) are located in the western part of Handan [11]; (b) the groundwater is seriously over-exploited because it is the most important source for agriculture which is the main industry [12]; (c) transferred water and local water conservancy projects cannot be organically combined, and thus cannot realize the maximum benefit of transferred water [13]; (d) there is a serious competition among different water users [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%