Plant and small‐mammal responses to large‐herbivore exclusion in an African savanna: five years of the UHURU experiment

Abstract

Assessing the direct and indirect consequences of nonrandom species removal within guilds of strongly interacting species, such as large mammalian herbivores, is an important goal in basic and applied ecology. The ecological impacts of such perturbations are often contingent on abiotic conditions, which have hindered efforts to generalize the results of field experiments. Thus, there is a need for experiments that selectively remove different species from ecologically important guilds and that are replicated across environmental gradients. In 2008, we constructed a series of size‐selective large‐herbivore exclosures across a natural rainfall gradient in semi‐arid Kenyan savanna. This experiment (“UHURU”, for ungulate herbivory under rainfall uncertainty) aims to (a) characterize the effects of successively removing the largest size classes of herbivores from the system and (b) evaluate how the direction and magnitude of these effects are shaped by variation in precipitation regimes. UHURU consists of three electrically fenced herbivore‐exclusion treatments and an unfenced control, applied to blocks of contiguous 1‐ha plots. The three fenced treatments are: “Mega” (exclusion of elephants and giraffes only); “Meso” (exclusion of both megaherbivores and mesoherbivores, ∼40 kg and larger); and “Total” (exclusion of all herbivores ≥5 kg). Each block of treatments is replicated three times at each of three sites along the 20‐km rainfall gradient (increasing from 439 mm/yr in the north to 639 mm/yr in the south, with little background variation in soil attributes and species composition). We present data, spanning 2008–2013, from (a) biannual surveys of understory plants at 49 staked grid points within each of the 36 1‐ha plots (1764 total stakes); (b) annual woody‐plant censuses within the central 0.36 ha of each plot; (c) annual and semi‐annual monitoring of individually marked woody plants; (d) small‐mammal capture–mark–recapture sessions conducted every other month in total‐exclusion and open plots; (e) daily rainfall monitoring throughout the course of the experiment; and (f) quarterly large‐mammal dung surveys.

Plant DNA‐barcode library and community phylogeny for a semi‐arid East African savanna

“…From 2012 until 2018, we sampled plant species as extensively and thoroughly as possible from all vegetation zones in this ecosystem. Initial collections occurred within the UHURU (Goheen et al, ; Kartzinel et al, ) and KLEE (Young et al, ) experiments, where plant surveys are conducted at regular intervals. Subsequent collections spanned the extensive road network of MRC and the surrounding landscapes.…”

Large herbivores promote habitat specialization and beta diversity of African savanna trees

“…On red‐sands, we tested for similar trends in ACBR abundance in the UHURU experiment, which has used similar fence configurations to exclude megaherbivores and mesoherbivores from 1‐ha plots since 2008 (Pringle , Goheen et al. , Louthan et al , Kartzinel et al ). In 2014, we searched the central 3,600‐m 2 portion of each plot, counting all post‐sapling ACBR.…”

Low functional redundancy among mammalian browsers in regulating an encroaching shrub ( Solanum campylacanthum ) in African savannah

“…Unless otherwise specified, the data described below were collected within all 36 plots. Raw data from the first 5 years of UHURU are published elsewhere [33].…”

“…We have previously documented increases in small-mammal abundance within exclosures [32,33]. For this study, we quantified the intensity of rodent seed predation across treatments by placing six Petri dishes (three containing 100 seeds, three containing 200 seeds, all unwashed), beneath mature plants in each of the 12 experimental plots at the southern site (900 total seeds plot 21 ).…”