2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant based indicators for irrigation scheduling in young cherry trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
20
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, during the second growing season, pomegranate trees had a lower capacity for tolerating water restrictions (Melgarejo, 2001;Bhantana and Lazarovitch et al, 2010). Similar results were found for olive and cherry trees (Martín-Vertedor et al, 2011;Livellara et al, 2011), but there were no effects of irrigation regimes on canopy volume in peach trees (Pérez-Pastor et al, 2014). This study showed that canopy growth was at a maximum when soil watering was equivalent to 100% or 130% of evapotranspiration (ETc).…”
Section: Effects Of Irrigation On Vegetative Growthsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, during the second growing season, pomegranate trees had a lower capacity for tolerating water restrictions (Melgarejo, 2001;Bhantana and Lazarovitch et al, 2010). Similar results were found for olive and cherry trees (Martín-Vertedor et al, 2011;Livellara et al, 2011), but there were no effects of irrigation regimes on canopy volume in peach trees (Pérez-Pastor et al, 2014). This study showed that canopy growth was at a maximum when soil watering was equivalent to 100% or 130% of evapotranspiration (ETc).…”
Section: Effects Of Irrigation On Vegetative Growthsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These results differed from the results for adult plants, where MDS was the most sensitive variable and the most useful for irrigation programming (Intrigliolo et al, 2011a;Galindo et al, 2013). However, in other studies conducted using young almond, lemon, olive and cherry trees, TGR was also sensitive to water availability (Moriana and Fereres, 2002;Nortes et al, 2005;Livellara et al, 2011). The higher sensitivity observed for TGR was associated with the fact that young plants characteristically have high growth rates, specifi c to their age, thus limiting the usefulness of MDS as a response variable (Moriana and Fereres, 2002).…”
Section: Soil Moisture Content (V/v) and Reference Evapotranspirationcontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“….) (Casadesús et al, 2012;Choné et al, 2001;Cifre et al, 2005;Jones, 1999;Livellara et al, 2011;Ortuño et al, 2010). Nevertheless, it still presents some difficulties in practical applications, mainly derived from the use of these sensors (or stress indicators), such as their high cost, data interpretation and the selection of the criteria to schedule irrigation.…”
Section: Irrigation Scheduling Based On Crop Water Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods adjust the amount of water supplied according to crop water requirements, the amount of water available in the channel and system components. In systems that use drip irrigation such information has not been considered, because the amount of water is controlled in a certain manner [8]. However, the frequency of irrigation drip systems still depends on climatic factors, soil type, and crop type, so that the control and close monitoring remains necessary in these systems [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%