2017 IEEE 2nd Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/itnec.2017.8284906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant classification based on stacked autoencoder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed model for automated cultivar differentiation in CAU yields highly promising results, surpassing existing methods in the literature by a significant margin [4][5][6][7]. Its efficacy and robustness are evident in the swift processing time of only 0.34 s per image, enabling the accurate identification of CAU cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed model for automated cultivar differentiation in CAU yields highly promising results, surpassing existing methods in the literature by a significant margin [4][5][6][7]. Its efficacy and robustness are evident in the swift processing time of only 0.34 s per image, enabling the accurate identification of CAU cultivars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…While these approaches have proven efficacious in certain scenarios, they are notably deficient in their capacity to accurately classify specific cultivars such as CAU. This limitation primarily stems from their inability to discern the intricate nuances and complex attributes that are unique to various CAU cultivars, resulting in inefficiencies and inaccuracies in classification processes [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SAE is suitable for classification problems. For instance, in plant classification [14], three different auto-encoders were evaluated. The method achieved up to 93% accuracy for classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%