2002
DOI: 10.23986/afsci.5717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant communities of field boundaries in Finnish farmland

Abstract: To determine the importance of field boundary habitats for farmland biodiversity, we surveyed a total of 193 boundaries from four climatically and agriculturally dissimilar regions in Finland. We measured the current plant species richness and composition of the boundaries, and, based on the differences in vegetation characteristics, we describe six boundary types.The observed plant species were mainly indicators of fresh to wet soils and moderate to rich mineral nitrogen content. The most frequent species wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, all management regimes resulted in similar abundances of these species, a result also reported in previous studies of mainly unmanaged boundaries (Tarmi, Tuuri, & Helenius, 2002). In the present study, and that of Tarmi et al (2002), only E. repens was frequent and abundant in the boundaries, whereas several other generalist, fertile-soil-favouring species were frequent at usually low abundance, on average. Elymus repens, which may also produce thick litter layers if its biomass is not removed, was linked to litter abundance in the ordination analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In the present study, all management regimes resulted in similar abundances of these species, a result also reported in previous studies of mainly unmanaged boundaries (Tarmi, Tuuri, & Helenius, 2002). In the present study, and that of Tarmi et al (2002), only E. repens was frequent and abundant in the boundaries, whereas several other generalist, fertile-soil-favouring species were frequent at usually low abundance, on average. Elymus repens, which may also produce thick litter layers if its biomass is not removed, was linked to litter abundance in the ordination analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Floristic diversity varies with agricultural intensity and landscape structure (Grevilliot and Muller 1996, Godreau et al 1999, de Blois et al 2002, Landsberg et al 2002, with successional stage of abandoned pastures (Bazzaz 1975, Stover and Marks 1998, Gondard et al 2000, and with the structure of hedgerow and field-margin habitats (Jobin et al 1996, Boutin et al 2002, Garbutt and Sparks 2002, Le Coeur et al 2002, Tarmi et al 2002, Thomas et al 2002. These studies provide insights into the kinds of patterns that might occur in tropical systems (Trebino et al 1996, Burel et al 1998, de Blois et al 2002, but few actually examine the entire plant communities of countryside or examine the differences between native and humandominated habitats within them (Marks 1983, Hill et al 2002, Schmidt and Barnwell 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study regions vary in plant species composition due to differences in the intensity of cultivation (e.g., Tarmi et al 2002). The southern and southwestern parts of Finland are situated in the hemiboreal and southern boreal zones (Ahti et al 1968), and they have the most advantageous climatic conditions for agriculture in Finland.…”
Section: Species Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abundance, measured as percentage cover, was estimated using a scale of 9 classes (1 \ 0.125%, 2 = 0.125-0.5%, 3 = 0.5-2%, 4 = 2-4%, 5 = 4-8%, 6 = 8-16%, 7 = 16-32%, 8 = 32-64%, 9 [ 64%) (Oksanen 1981;Tarmi et al 2002). For analyses, the classes were transformed into the mean coverage values for each class (1 = 0.0625%, 2 = 0.3125%, 3 = 1.25%, 4 = 3%, 5 = 6%, 6 = 12%, 7 = 24%, 8 = 48%, 9 = 82%).…”
Section: Species Datamentioning
confidence: 99%