2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant community development following restoration treatments on a legacy reclaimed mine site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such reclamation has led to improved water quality, deterred soil erosion, and buffered soil pH (Davison et al, 1984), as the SMCRA policy intended. However, despite these improvements, soil conditions on reclaimed mine sites remain low in fertility, high in compaction, prone to drought conditions, and subject to invasive herbaceous species (Steiger, 1996;Bauman et al, 2015). Our study only sampled from one SMCRA site and, therefore, our results did not reflect the regional changes in the fungal species pools or illustrate variations of soil chemistry among different sites within the region (Cavender et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Such reclamation has led to improved water quality, deterred soil erosion, and buffered soil pH (Davison et al, 1984), as the SMCRA policy intended. However, despite these improvements, soil conditions on reclaimed mine sites remain low in fertility, high in compaction, prone to drought conditions, and subject to invasive herbaceous species (Steiger, 1996;Bauman et al, 2015). Our study only sampled from one SMCRA site and, therefore, our results did not reflect the regional changes in the fungal species pools or illustrate variations of soil chemistry among different sites within the region (Cavender et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The Flight 93 reforestation planting phases were established over the last six years, which provides an opportunity to observe how the site will progress. Overall, the site is following the expected seral stages of "old-field" succession (Barnes et al, 1998) with some important differences that were detailed by Bauman et. al.…”
Section: Objective 3 Competing Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Grassland reclamation falls under SMCRA, but has led to higher rates of soil compaction and the proliferation of widespread ground covers that slow the natural encroachment of forests (e.g., Angel et al 2009;Groninger et al 2007). The groundcover vegetation commonly used in grassland reclamation are often low diversity and exotic cool season grasses and forbs, that tend to form denser biomass cover, are shallow rooted, and aggressive (e.g., Cavender et al 2014;Bauman et al 2015;Swab et al 2017).…”
Section: Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (Smcra)mentioning
confidence: 99%