“…In addition, this study uncovered some complicating factors that may have affected the overall data interpretations: 1) information to asses bone collagen preservation according to established collagen quality criteria 62 , 63 were not always available in the surveyed literature; 2) several ancient Andean populations have poor collagen preservation, thus not providing sufficient bone collagen for dating or isotopic analyses, and considerable temporal and regional gaps were observed in the sampled isotope data; 3) the sites contained different numbers of human individuals, which may impact the observed variability; 4) some sites lack information on faunal and botanical remains, and the data preclude the construction of local isotope baselines therefore limiting the possibility of obtaining refined dietary estimates; 5) most of studies from the past three decades included in this research did not have access to the methods currently used for analyzing bioapatite integrity (i.e., Raman spectroscopy and FTIR) 83 , thus, enamel and bioapatite diagenesis cannot be estimated, additionally, there is a potential issue with the interlaboratory variation of δ 13 C ap analysis 91 ; 7) despite the accuracy of the methods employed, we should consider isotopic equifinality, that is, varying combinations of food contributions that may result in the same consumer isotopic values; finally, 8) isotopic markers are unable to differentiate cultivated from non-cultivated plants, which is central in this discussion, however, based on available references 2 , 4 , 7 , 10 , 12 , 26 , we can assume, that most plants behind the isotopic values observed in this study were domesticated crops.…”