1999
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183x0039000200019x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Density‐Dependent Variation in Density, Frequency, and Size of Watermelon Fruits

Abstract: Quantitative analyses of the continuous response of components of the biomass of fruits of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum & Nakai] to variation in plant density could provide insight into the mechanisms underlying effects of plant density on marketable yield. Per unit area, the linear response of fruit biomass to plant density recently has been shown to explain the linear response of marketable yield. In the current study we quantify plant density‐dependent variation in the size, density (no. pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
17
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason that no yield gain was realized with the interplanted 'SF800' versus the hill-planted 'SF800' treatment in 2006 like in 2005 is unclear. Reducing the inrow spacing decreases the size of the watermelon fruit (Duthie et al, 1999a(Duthie et al, , 1999bMotsenbocker and Arancibia, 2002;NeSmith, 1993). In our studies, triploid fruit size was unaffected by less spacing between plants (interplanting) compared with hill planting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…The reason that no yield gain was realized with the interplanted 'SF800' versus the hill-planted 'SF800' treatment in 2006 like in 2005 is unclear. Reducing the inrow spacing decreases the size of the watermelon fruit (Duthie et al, 1999a(Duthie et al, , 1999bMotsenbocker and Arancibia, 2002;NeSmith, 1993). In our studies, triploid fruit size was unaffected by less spacing between plants (interplanting) compared with hill planting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Resende & Costa (2003), trabalhando com Crimson Sweet obtiveram maior número de frutos por planta (1,4) nos maiores espaçamentos (3,0 x 0,8 m). Duthie et al (1999) também observaram maior número de frutos por planta em menores densidades de plantio. Estas observações não foram corroboradas com esta pesquisa.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…O maior número de frutos por planta (1,35 frutos) foi apresentado pelo espaçamento 3,00 x 0,80 m. Resultados estes concordantes com Duthie et al (1999) que observaram maior número de frutos comerciais por planta em menores densidades. O menor número de frutos por planta, com o aumento da densidade de plantio, devese possivelmente à menor disponibilidade de espaço entre plantas, que promove maior competição por elementos nutritivos, água e luz e conseqüentemente diminuição da atividade fotossintética, produção de ramificações, folhas, flores e processo de polinização através das abelhas (principais responsáveis pela fecundação dos frutos).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified