2014
DOI: 10.2478/jppr-2014-0035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Extract Control of the Fungi Associated with Different Egyptian Wheat Cultivars Grains

Abstract: Grain samples of 14 Egyptian wheat cultivars were tested for seed-borne fungi. The deep freezing method was used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between these options are biological plant products, which are bio-efficacious, biodegradable, cost-effective and safe for the environment. Many investigators used biological plant products to control plant pathogens [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between these options are biological plant products, which are bio-efficacious, biodegradable, cost-effective and safe for the environment. Many investigators used biological plant products to control plant pathogens [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common species were A. niger, A. flavus, A. terreus, A. nidulans, A. alternata, Cladosporium herbarum, and F. oxysporum. Another study was conducted to detect wheat seed-borne mycoflora from 14 Egyptian wheat cultivars by Baka [11]. The most frequent fungi were A. flavus, A. niger, A. alternata, and F. verticillioides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be that the AHL signaling system is a promising target for developing novel approaches to control bacterial infections. Recently, some chemicals were found to act as AHL antagonists and inhibit bacterial QS (Cotar 2013;Mohamed 2014). The known small chemicals with QS inhibition activity were grouped into two categories according to their structures and functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the bacterial dependence on QS for the infection of hosts, it makes good evolutionary sense that eukaryotes have acquired the ability to recognise and respond to bacterial QS signals (Smith and Iglewski 2003) and the ability to actively interfere with bacterial QS through the production of compounds that mimic or inhibit the bacterial signals (Bauer and Teplitski 2001). Plants have been shown to produce secondary metabolites (Zare et al 2012;Mohamed 2014) and plants also produce AHL mimic compounds, possibly to manipulate the microbial rhizosphere population (Tolmacheva et al 2014). Seedlings of various plant species and exudates from pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedling induce swarming in Serratia liquefaciens (Grimes and Hennerty 1931) and activate several AHL reporter systems, in addition to inhibiting QS-regulated phenotypes in Chromobacterium violaceum (Schröter 1872) (Teplitski et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%