2000
DOI: 10.1080/10587250008023631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Fibres in Composites. Comparative Results between Hemp, Kenaf and Flax Fibres. Preparation of Raw Material and Final Products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydrophilic natural fiber and hydrophobic polymer matrices have poor interfacial adhesion. Several chemical treatments like have been used to improve the fiber–polymer interface by surface modification . Alkaline and silane treatments are commonly adopted by most of the researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrophilic natural fiber and hydrophobic polymer matrices have poor interfacial adhesion. Several chemical treatments like have been used to improve the fiber–polymer interface by surface modification . Alkaline and silane treatments are commonly adopted by most of the researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical and chemical methods can be used to optimize this interface. These modification methods are of different efficiency for the adhesion between the matrix and fiber (Cappelletto 2000). Different treatments of flax fibers aimed at improving the adhesion with a polymer matrix may alter not only the fiber surface properties but also fiber strength (Joffe 2003).…”
Section: Chemical Treatment Of Fiber and Its Effect On Thermoplastic mentioning
confidence: 99%