2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00978.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant functional traits, herbivore selectivity and response to sheep grazing in Patagonian steppe grasslands

Abstract: Summary 1.In some ecosystems there is a positive feedback between forage quality and grazing intensity. This involves three components of plant tolerance to grazing: functional traits, herbivore selectivity and response to grazing. We analysed the relationships between these components at species and community levels in Patagonian steppe grasslands. 2. We measured plant functional traits [height, specific leaf area (SLA) and foliar toughness] and estimated sheep selectivity and grazing response indices for 35 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

22
203
4
24

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
22
203
4
24
Order By: Relevance
“…These patterns of response represent a functional trade-off linked with the species strategies of resource-use and plant growth in different environments (D铆az and Cabido, 1997;Weiher et al, 1999). A conservative strategy was associated with low stocking rate, characterized by the increase in species with a low SLA, in agreement with reports of Cingolani et al (2005) and Leoni et al (2009), and high LDMC. Our results were consistent with findings of Cruz et al (2010) that reported LDMC and SLA as the traits that best described the response associated with the stocking rate increase.…”
Section: Attributessupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These patterns of response represent a functional trade-off linked with the species strategies of resource-use and plant growth in different environments (D铆az and Cabido, 1997;Weiher et al, 1999). A conservative strategy was associated with low stocking rate, characterized by the increase in species with a low SLA, in agreement with reports of Cingolani et al (2005) and Leoni et al (2009), and high LDMC. Our results were consistent with findings of Cruz et al (2010) that reported LDMC and SLA as the traits that best described the response associated with the stocking rate increase.…”
Section: Attributessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The main changes related to grazing intensity were consistent with previous studies that reported the decrease of tall cool-season grasses with the increase in grazing intensity in North American mixed-grass prairies (Manley et al, 1997;Derner and Hart, 2007), in Uruguayan grasslands (Rodr铆guez et al, 2003;Altesor et al, 2005) and a decrease in all perennial grasses in Australia (Lavorel et al, 1997;McIntyre and Lavorel, 2001). The tall grasses are better adapted to capture resources at low grazing intensities, but are less grazing resistant under high grazing intensities (Cingolani et al, 2005). This can be explained because tall cool-season grasses have less leaf area index after grazing, less reserve organs and their growing points are more exposed to damage comparing with prostrate grasses.…”
Section: Species Traits and Grazing Responsementioning
confidence: 90%
“…La respuesta de las comunidades de pastizal al pastoreo ha dado lugar a un cuerpo te贸rico y emp铆rico considerable que pretende identificar las caracter铆sticas morfol贸gicas y funcionales m谩s relevantes relacionadas con esta actividad (McIntyre et al 1999), as铆 como los atributos (estados posibles de esas caracter铆sticas que representa cada especie) afectados positiva o negativamente por la misma (Montalvo et al 1991, D铆az et al 2001, Cingolani et al 2005b, de Bello et al 2005, D铆az et al 2007, Kahmen y Poschlod 2008. La interpretaci贸n de la respuesta del conjunto de atributos que se expresan en cada especie da lugar a diferentes estrategias (o s铆ndromes de respuesta) para defenderse o tolerar el pastoreo (Grime et al 1997, Lavorel et al 1997, Westoby 1998, Kahmen y Poschold 2004, de Miguel et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Although tolerance of herbivore damage reduces the fitness consequences through post-damage regrowth and reproduction (Briske 1991;Strauss and Agrawal 1999;D谋麓az et al 2001;Cingolani et al 2005;Evju et al 2009), plant resistance reduces the extent of herbivore damage (Tiffin 2000). Resistance can be divided into antibiosis, which reduces herbivore performance, and avoidance, which allows plants to escape from herbivory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%