Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Background In today’s conditions, it is not possible to eliminate chemical inputs without reducing food production. Therefore, integrated methods that reduce the negative effects of chemical inputs are needed. One of the alternatives is the use of beneficial bacteria, which can both improve the yield and quality of vegetable crops and reduce the use of chemical fertilisers. This research was carried out to test the effects of a microbial fertiliser combined with inorganic fertiliser on the growth, biochemical properties and yield of lettuce and whether the use of chemical fertilisers could be reduced. Caipira curly lettuce variety was used as plant material. The microbial fertilizer used contains 7 different microorganisms and 2 different yeasts. The experiment consisted of eight treatments: Control (T 0 ), 100% Chemical Fertilisation (T 1 ), 50% Chemical Fertilisation + Microbial Fertilisation (T 2 ), 75% Chemical Fertilisation + Microbial Fertilization (T 3 ), 100% Chemical Fertilisation + Microbial Fertilisation (T 4 ), Microbial Fertilisation Alone (T 5 ), 50% Chemical Fertilisation + Microbial Fertilisation + Foliar Microbial Fertilisation (T 6 ), 75% Chemical Fertilisation + Microbial Fertilisation + Foliar Microbial Fertilisation (T 7 ). Results The results of the research were statistically evaluated using analysis of variance at a significance level of p < 0.05, and the means were compared using the LSD test. It was observed that the microbial fertiliser did not adversely effect on the growth characteristics of lettuce and even had an ameliorative effect. The highest root dry weights were obtained in the T 7 , T 3 , T 4 and T 1 treatments. T 7 treatment had 7.8% and 5.5% more dry weight than T 1 and T 4 respectively. Biochemical properties were significantly affected by treatments and it was significant that T 2 and T 4 had similar results. Because chemical fertilizer dose was reduced by 50% in the T 2 treatment. The chemical fertiliser dose was reduced by 50% in the T 2 treatment. Microbial fertiliser treatments had no negative effect on lettuce colour formation and even greener lettuces were harvested from T 1 , T 7 , T 3 and T 6 treatments. The highest total yield was obtained from T 3 (30638.89 kg ha − 1 ) and T 7 (30518.52 kg ha ...
Background In today’s conditions, it is not possible to eliminate chemical inputs without reducing food production. Therefore, integrated methods that reduce the negative effects of chemical inputs are needed. One of the alternatives is the use of beneficial bacteria, which can both improve the yield and quality of vegetable crops and reduce the use of chemical fertilisers. This research was carried out to test the effects of a microbial fertiliser combined with inorganic fertiliser on the growth, biochemical properties and yield of lettuce and whether the use of chemical fertilisers could be reduced. Caipira curly lettuce variety was used as plant material. The microbial fertilizer used contains 7 different microorganisms and 2 different yeasts. The experiment consisted of eight treatments: Control (T 0 ), 100% Chemical Fertilisation (T 1 ), 50% Chemical Fertilisation + Microbial Fertilisation (T 2 ), 75% Chemical Fertilisation + Microbial Fertilization (T 3 ), 100% Chemical Fertilisation + Microbial Fertilisation (T 4 ), Microbial Fertilisation Alone (T 5 ), 50% Chemical Fertilisation + Microbial Fertilisation + Foliar Microbial Fertilisation (T 6 ), 75% Chemical Fertilisation + Microbial Fertilisation + Foliar Microbial Fertilisation (T 7 ). Results The results of the research were statistically evaluated using analysis of variance at a significance level of p < 0.05, and the means were compared using the LSD test. It was observed that the microbial fertiliser did not adversely effect on the growth characteristics of lettuce and even had an ameliorative effect. The highest root dry weights were obtained in the T 7 , T 3 , T 4 and T 1 treatments. T 7 treatment had 7.8% and 5.5% more dry weight than T 1 and T 4 respectively. Biochemical properties were significantly affected by treatments and it was significant that T 2 and T 4 had similar results. Because chemical fertilizer dose was reduced by 50% in the T 2 treatment. The chemical fertiliser dose was reduced by 50% in the T 2 treatment. Microbial fertiliser treatments had no negative effect on lettuce colour formation and even greener lettuces were harvested from T 1 , T 7 , T 3 and T 6 treatments. The highest total yield was obtained from T 3 (30638.89 kg ha − 1 ) and T 7 (30518.52 kg ha ...
The growing emphasis on sustainable agriculture has made the comparison of organic and chemical fertilizers within the context of soil enrichment and crop yield improvement a vital subject of study very important. Internet of Things (IoT) technology enables this study to fully evaluate the effectiveness of conventional and organic fertilisers. In agricultural settings, we installed a network of IoT sensors to monitor crop development indicators and significant soil parameters like pH, moisture content, and nutrient levels. We examined the data to see how various kinds of fertiliser influenced harvest success and soil condition. Our findings show that whilst chemical fertilisers produce greater initial crop yields and fast nutrient availability, organic fertilisers help to maintain soil health and sustainable output over time. The IoT enabled approach helps one to better grasp the dynamics of fertiliser application and their effects on agricultural output. This paper emphasises the possibilities of IoT technology to enhance agricultural practices by means of well-informed decision-making, therefore enhancing food production productivity and sustainability.
The importance of selecting an appropriate berseem variety and implementing effective nutrient management practices is crucial for maximizing both the production and economic potential of forage crops. This was clearly demonstrated in a field experiment conducted during the rabi seasons of 2019–2020 and 2020–2021. The experimental setup was a factorial randomized block design incorporating five berseem varieties (Mescavi, HB-1, HB-2, BL-10, and BL-42) and five integrated nutrient management practices: 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) or NM-1, 75% RDF + plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or NM-2, 75% RDF + municipal solid waste compost (MSWC) or NM-3, 75% RDF + farmyard manure (FYM) + PGPR or NM-4, and 50% RDF + MSWC + PGPR or NM-5. The objective of the experiment was to evaluate the physio-morphological responses, biomass yield, and economic efficiencies of different berseem varieties under various nutrient management practices. The experimental results highlighted the superior performance of the BL-42 variety in terms of growth and yield attributes compared to the other tested berseem varieties. Specifically, BL-42 showed an enhancement in total green fodder yield by 17.10%, 26.60%, 37.75%, and 28.04% over the varieties BL-10, HB-2, HB-1, and Mescavi, respectively. Moreover, the application of the 75% RDF + FYM + PGPR treatment (NM-4) significantly boosted the total green fodder yield by 13.08%, 14.29%, 34.48%, and 39.02% over the 75% RDF + MSWC, 100% RDF, 75% RDF + PGPR, and 50% RDF + MSWC + PGPR treatments, respectively. In terms of economic returns, BL-42 achieved a significantly higher gross return (GR) and net return (NR) of 194,989 ₹/ha and 145,142 ₹/ha, respectively, compared to the GR and NR of BL-10 (166,512 and 116,665 ₹/ha, respectively). Similarly, the nutrient management practice of 75% RDF + FYM + PGPR recorded the highest GR and NR (191,638 and 137,346 ₹/ha, respectively) compared to the 100% RDF treatment (167,593 and 120,716 ₹/ha, respectively). These findings underscore the critical role of variety selection and tailored nutrient management in optimizing both the yield and economic gains in forage crop cultivation. The significant differences in production and returns highlight the potential of targeted agronomic strategies to enhance the profitability and sustainability of forage farming.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.