2002
DOI: 10.2307/1554893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Identification Terminology: An Illustrated Glossary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
13

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
53
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The descriptions of the family, genera, and species, as well as the identification key were prepared based on samples recorded within Ceará State. The terminologies of the vegetative and fertile morphological characters follow Harris & Harris (2001). Data referring to the growth forms (habits), habitats, phenology (period of flowering/fruiting), and popular names were obtained from the herbarium labels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The descriptions of the family, genera, and species, as well as the identification key were prepared based on samples recorded within Ceará State. The terminologies of the vegetative and fertile morphological characters follow Harris & Harris (2001). Data referring to the growth forms (habits), habitats, phenology (period of flowering/fruiting), and popular names were obtained from the herbarium labels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphological terminology follows the specialized Leguminosae literature, including Polhill & Raven (1981), van der Werff (2008), and LPWG (2017). Indumentum terminology follows Font- Quer (1989), Beentje et al (2001), and Schmid et al (2002), complemented by Ellis et al (2009), Payne (1978), and Theobald et al (1979). The conservation status was assessed using GeoCat software (http://geocat.kew.org; Bachman et al 2011), following IUCN (2019) criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphological terminology follows the specialized literature of Stafleu (1948) and Marcano-Berti (2014), complemented with specific terminologies from Payne (1978), Font Quer (1989, Beentje et al (2001), Schmid et al (2002), andEllis et al (2009). The species conservation status was assessed using GeoCat software (http://geocat.kew.org; Bachman et al 2011)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%