2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant invasion and fragmentation indirectly and contrastingly affect native plants and grassland arthropods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is widely believed that habitat destruction strongly affects invasive species. The current literature indicates that habitat destruction can promote the success of invasive species (Gallé et al, 2023;Kumschick et al, 2015). For example, With (2004) and Pearson and Dawson (2005) suggested that exotic species with greater dispersal ability may benefit more from habitat destruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is widely believed that habitat destruction strongly affects invasive species. The current literature indicates that habitat destruction can promote the success of invasive species (Gallé et al, 2023;Kumschick et al, 2015). For example, With (2004) and Pearson and Dawson (2005) suggested that exotic species with greater dispersal ability may benefit more from habitat destruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the interaction between biological invasion and habitat destruction has garnered much attention (Alofs & Fowler, 2010;Gallé et al, 2023), understanding how these invasions and destruction collectively impact the long-term persistence of native communities remains challenging. For instance, when habitat destruction and invasion co-occur, native species have a greater chance of persistence than when invasion occurs on its own, particularly if invasive species possess stronger competition or dispersal ability than native species (Yang & Liu, 2023).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%