2021
DOI: 10.18280/ts.380603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Leaf Classification and Comparative Analysis of Combined Feature Set Using Machine Learning Techniques

Abstract: The main purpose of this research work is to apply machine learning and image processing techniques for plant classification efficiently. In the plant classification system, the conventional method is time-consuming and needs to apply expensive analytical instruments. The automated plant classification system helps to predict plant classes easily. The most challenging part of the automated plant classification research is to extract unique features of leaves. This paper proposes a plant classification model us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Swedish dataset, as shown in Table 10, the classification accuracy of 98.9% using the proposed method is only slightly lower than 99.41% of the Pearline’s method 32 and 98.99% of Ariyapadath’s method 59 …”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the Swedish dataset, as shown in Table 10, the classification accuracy of 98.9% using the proposed method is only slightly lower than 99.41% of the Pearline’s method 32 and 98.99% of Ariyapadath’s method 59 …”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For the Swedish dataset, as shown in Table 10, the classification accuracy of 98.9% using the proposed method is only slightly lower than 99.41% of the Pearline's method 32 and 98.99% of Ariyapadath's method. 59 For the ICL dataset, as shown in Table 11, the classification accuracy is 91.5% using the proposed method, lower than Lei's 62 94.1% and Zhang's 64 94.61% and equivalent to Yang's 61 91.6%.…”
Section: Overall Evaluation Of the Plant Classification Systemmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Table 2, 3, and 5 shows the VOI, GCE & JD of Proposed technique is low as compare to other methods. Thus, the proposed algorithm is proved to be better compared to the existing algorithms [25,26].…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To determine similarity between data points, it employs the Euclidean distance, Manhattan distance, chi-square, and cosine similarity methods. The KNN classifier performs better with fewer input variables and the same data size [30]. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) is used as a classifier to aid in the determination of suitable decision boundaries or hyperplanes for performing multiple tasks.…”
Section: Classification Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%