2018
DOI: 10.2172/1495192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant-Level Scenario-Based Risk Analysis for Enhanced Resilient PWR – SBO and LBLOCA

Abstract: This report documents the activities performed by Idaho National Laboratory (INL) during the fiscal year (FY) 2018 for the DOE Light Water Reactor Sustainability (LWRS) Program, Risk-Informed System Analysis (RISA) Pathway, Enhanced Resilient Plant (ERP) Systems research. The purpose of the RISA Pathway research and development is to support plant owner-operator decisions with the aim to improve the economics, reliability, and maintain the high levels of safety of current nuclear power plants over periods of e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates the need in future work to perform high-fidelity calculations using, e.g., a coupled code system like RELAP5-3D and INL's BISON thermomechanical code. 74 Finally, recent activities that have been performed at INL to assess the performance of near-term ATFs for other DBA cases 28,75 produced a broader picture of the benefits derived from their introduction into a PWR. Results from these activities have also confirmed Outcomes 1 and 2, reported before.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates the need in future work to perform high-fidelity calculations using, e.g., a coupled code system like RELAP5-3D and INL's BISON thermomechanical code. 74 Finally, recent activities that have been performed at INL to assess the performance of near-term ATFs for other DBA cases 28,75 produced a broader picture of the benefits derived from their introduction into a PWR. Results from these activities have also confirmed Outcomes 1 and 2, reported before.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Эти события восстановления можно рассматривать как «нормальные» или Тип 1 с β ~ 0,22 без дополнительных значительных повреждений или трудностей, например, при незначительных ледяных штормах, локальных пожарах и городских сбоях (отключение электроэнергии в Куинсе в штате Нью-Йорк [4,15]). Кроме того, «вероятность отказа рабочего места оператора при восстановлении мощности переменного тока» с использованием аварийных батарей и дизельных генераторов (ДГ) P(АС) ДГ после обесточивания АЭС была рассчитана в [21] для «представительного» большого блока питания. Наиболее приближенная к 9 точкам [21, Таблица 4-13] в) сильное землетрясение в северо-восточной части Японии и цунами вызвали обесточивание и потерю внешнего энергоснабжения на долгий период времени у 9 ядерных реакторов на Фукусиме [22,23].…”
Section: сравнение данных по аварийному реагированию на ураган «катрина» и радиационную аварию на аэс фукусима с теориейunclassified
“…4 также показаны результаты расчета более высокой (λ АС = 0,001) или низкой (λ АС = 0,01) частоты отказов аварийной или резервной систем. Для сравнения показаны результаты отключения АЭС с Типом 1 «нормальный» в виде короткой временной шкалы (β = 0,22) с использованием частоты отказов аварийных систем λ ~ 0,091, которая была получена из опубликованной статьи с расчетами отключения АЭС [21].…”
Section: сравнение данных по аварийному реагированию на ураган «катрина» и радиационную аварию на аэс фукусима с теориейunclassified
“…This section presents a risk-informed analysis on ATF with the same generic PWR plant SAPHIRE PRA model and the same INL Generic PWR (IGPWR) RELAP5-3D model used in FY 2018 activities (Ma & al., 2018). Loss of feedwater (LOFW) and SGTR accident scenarios are developed by reviewing the PRA model and then analyzed by RELAP5-3D code for near-term ATF designs, FeCrAl, and Cr-coated cladding.…”
Section: Risk-informed Atf Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other was to investigate various approaches to accomplish the ERP research objective, i.e., use RISA methods and toolkit to enhance existing reactors safety features and reduce plant operating costs. The FY 2018 ERP report (Ma & al., 2018) also describes the ERP analysis process, ERP analysis tools, and various analysis approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%