2023
DOI: 10.1111/mec.17142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant neopolyploidy and genetic background differentiate the microbiome of duckweed across a variety of natural freshwater sources

Thomas J. Anneberg,
Martin M. Turcotte,
Tia‐Lynn Ashman

Abstract: Whole‐genome duplication has long been appreciated for its role in driving phenotypic novelty in plants, often altering the way organisms interface with the abiotic environment. Only recently, however, have we begun to investigate how polyploidy influences interactions of plants with other species, despite the biotic niche being predicted as one of the main determinants of polyploid establishment. Nevertheless, we lack information about how polyploidy affects the diversity and composition of the microbial taxa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 91 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This disconnect suggests that functional differences within diploid S. polyrhiza may derive from epigenetic variation that can be altered by autopolyploidization along with genetic variation ( Chen, 2007 ; Huber et al, 2021 ) and strongly influence stress tolerance and population growth. Regardless of the mechanism, our results join those of several others demonstrating the importance of genetic variation in diploid progenitors on neopolyploid morphology ( Wei et al, 2020 ), population growth ( Anneberg et al, 2023a ), and response to abiotic ( Bafort et al, 2023 ; Wei et al, 2020 ) and biotic interactions ( Anneberg et al, 2023b ; Assour et al, 2023 ; Forrester et al, 2020 ). They provide additional support for the idea that the repeated evolution of polyploids may be key to their success ( Kolář et al, 2017 ; Soltis & Soltis, 1999 ; Wei et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This disconnect suggests that functional differences within diploid S. polyrhiza may derive from epigenetic variation that can be altered by autopolyploidization along with genetic variation ( Chen, 2007 ; Huber et al, 2021 ) and strongly influence stress tolerance and population growth. Regardless of the mechanism, our results join those of several others demonstrating the importance of genetic variation in diploid progenitors on neopolyploid morphology ( Wei et al, 2020 ), population growth ( Anneberg et al, 2023a ), and response to abiotic ( Bafort et al, 2023 ; Wei et al, 2020 ) and biotic interactions ( Anneberg et al, 2023b ; Assour et al, 2023 ; Forrester et al, 2020 ). They provide additional support for the idea that the repeated evolution of polyploids may be key to their success ( Kolář et al, 2017 ; Soltis & Soltis, 1999 ; Wei et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%