2015
DOI: 10.5194/we-15-1-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant–plant interactions: from competition to facilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has been assessed both experimentally as well as using synthetic approaches. In general, both competition (leading to detrimental effects) and facilitation (leading to beneficial effects) are considered as the main general principles of species interactions [165,166]. In respect to competition for resources, nutrients, water, and light are considered to have main importance [167].…”
Section: Plant-plant Interactions In Coastal Grasslandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been assessed both experimentally as well as using synthetic approaches. In general, both competition (leading to detrimental effects) and facilitation (leading to beneficial effects) are considered as the main general principles of species interactions [165,166]. In respect to competition for resources, nutrients, water, and light are considered to have main importance [167].…”
Section: Plant-plant Interactions In Coastal Grasslandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This focus on competition does not account for the impact of the abiotic environment on plant interactions, and the type of interaction can change from competitive to facilitative depending on the environmental conditions (Pugnaire & Luque 2001). When environmental stress is low, species compete for available resources, whereas facilitation often increases in stressful environments (Montesinos 2015). Coastal dunes are subjected to a variety of stressors including high temperatures, drought, salt spray, salt stress, burial, nutrient deficiency, and wave impact (Oosting & Billings 1942; Franks & Peterson 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%