2002
DOI: 10.2307/1552480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant-Pollinator Relationships at Two Altitudes in the Andes of Mendoza, Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
42
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
42
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive relationship between pollinator richness and plant population size has been found in other studies (Conner and Neumeier 1995;Kunin 1997), and it is expected as a consequence of the species richnessarea relationship. Interestingly, and in contrast to many studies that have shown a decrease in pollinator richness with altitude (Arroyo et al 1982;Medan et al 2002;Devoto et al 2005;Hodkinson 2005), we found no effect of altitude on pollinator richness or diversity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The positive relationship between pollinator richness and plant population size has been found in other studies (Conner and Neumeier 1995;Kunin 1997), and it is expected as a consequence of the species richnessarea relationship. Interestingly, and in contrast to many studies that have shown a decrease in pollinator richness with altitude (Arroyo et al 1982;Medan et al 2002;Devoto et al 2005;Hodkinson 2005), we found no effect of altitude on pollinator richness or diversity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since reproductive output was similar between both wallflowers, overall pollination efficiency seems to be independent on the type of insects visiting the flowers. Pollinators are limiting in most high mountain environments due to their scarcity, their temporal asynchrony with flowering period, or their low efficiency (Arroyo et al, 1985(Arroyo et al, , 2006Devoto et al, 2005;Gómez and Zamora, 1999;Hodkinson, 2005;Medan et al, 2002;Warren et al, 1988). In our study, we believe that the main reason causing the low reproductive output of the studied plants is the low efficiency of the main flower visitors, ants and beetles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Pollinators are limiting in most high mountain environments, either for their scarcity or for their temporal asynchrony with flowering period (Arroyo et al, 1985(Arroyo et al, , 2006Warren et al, 1988). In addition, the pollination rate and average efficiency also decreases altitudinally as a consequence of the turnover in the pollinator fauna with altitude (Devoto et al, 2005;Gómez and Zamora, 1999;Hodkinson, 2005;Medan et al, 2002). In general, bees and beeflies are replaced in alpine environments by low energy-demanding and low-efficient pollinators, like flies, beetles and ants (Gómez and Zamora, 1999;Lien and Yuan, 2004;Pyrcz and Wojtusiak, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional studies the interaction of all active plant and animal species is recorded within a restricted geographical extension (Medan et al, 2002;Memmott et al, 2004). A standard graphical description of these systems can be made through bipartite networks in which nodes (species) are linked (interact) only with nodes of the opposite guild (plants with animals and vice versa) (Albert and Barabási, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%