1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9452(96)04463-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant regeneration from adventitious roots of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) grown from protoplasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These morphological differences were probably due to the lower light intensity and higher humidity under in vitro conditions. Similar results were reported by Komai et al (1996), who obtained 1.46 x 10 7 protoplasts/g leaves when spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) seedlings cultured in vitro were treated from 4 to 10 hours with 2% cellulase R-10 and 0.5% macerozyme R-10. Hu et al (1999) also used the enzymatic solution of 2% cellulase R-10, 1.0% macerozyme, 0.5% driselase, between 15 and 20 hours, to isolate protoplasts from in vitro leaves and hypocotyl of several Brassica species.…”
Section: Hybridssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These morphological differences were probably due to the lower light intensity and higher humidity under in vitro conditions. Similar results were reported by Komai et al (1996), who obtained 1.46 x 10 7 protoplasts/g leaves when spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) seedlings cultured in vitro were treated from 4 to 10 hours with 2% cellulase R-10 and 0.5% macerozyme R-10. Hu et al (1999) also used the enzymatic solution of 2% cellulase R-10, 1.0% macerozyme, 0.5% driselase, between 15 and 20 hours, to isolate protoplasts from in vitro leaves and hypocotyl of several Brassica species.…”
Section: Hybridssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Yet, only a few adventitious buds were obtained that could not be grown into whole plant due to lack of root induction. Since then, spinach is supposed to be a recalcitrant plant. , Later, numerous research articles describing protocols of spinach in vitro regeneration were published, and almost all articles suggested a genotype-dependent response of spinach, which has appeared as a major bottleneck affecting its regeneration capacity. ,,,, The purpose of this study was to establish an efficient and reproducible in vitro regeneration system for the cultivar “Local Palak”. The explants taken from in vitro germinated plantlets were cultured onto various regeneration media containing a variety of plant hormones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NAA has a significant positive effect on in vitro regeneration. However, it was found that gibberellic acid (GA 3 ), in combination with auxins like NAA, IAA, and 2,4-D was very effective in inducing embryogenic calli spinach. , The effect of GA 3 has been emphasized in many studies for somatic embryogenesis as well as organogenesis. ,,, GA 3 is famous for encouraging the development of shoot primordium in plants, but its effects depend directly on the cultivar used, ,, the explant selected, concentration of GA 3 added to media, amount and types of other plant growth regulators, and the photoperiod and light intensity. The present study revealed the decisive role of GA 3 concentration on direct regeneration of spinach from petiole explants as described in Section .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It took almost twenty years to achieve the next success, when a plethora of reports appeared. Briefly, the system of micropropagation from shoot primordia was established [73], while de novo shoot organogenesis was induced from hypocotyls [74][75][76][77][78][79][80], cotyledons [78,[80][81][82], roots [78,83,84], leaves [68,85,86], mature dry seeds [87], and leaf protoplasts [88][89][90][91]. In addition, spinach calli are suitable for the establishment and maintenance of cell suspension cultures [92].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%