2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-010-0696-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant responses to heterogeneous environments: scaling from shoot modules and whole‐plant functions to ecosystem processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding underscores previous observations of the partial functional independence of quantity of leaf area and its arrangement in the canopy [32,33]. Changes in canopy structure which rearrange leaf area within the canopy have implications for canopy light interception and thus carbon storage rates [8,9,[40][41][42][43]. Such patterns were observed in a hemlock-dominated forest in southern Appalachia, where growth of successor species increased due to increased light availability in the first two years following mortality of Eastern hemlock [37] and similar results in numerous stand thinning experiments document increased stand production rates [12,13,18,32,33,36,37,39,[44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Functional Consequencessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This finding underscores previous observations of the partial functional independence of quantity of leaf area and its arrangement in the canopy [32,33]. Changes in canopy structure which rearrange leaf area within the canopy have implications for canopy light interception and thus carbon storage rates [8,9,[40][41][42][43]. Such patterns were observed in a hemlock-dominated forest in southern Appalachia, where growth of successor species increased due to increased light availability in the first two years following mortality of Eastern hemlock [37] and similar results in numerous stand thinning experiments document increased stand production rates [12,13,18,32,33,36,37,39,[44][45][46][47].…”
Section: Functional Consequencessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Plant communities under grazing may be considered as collections of individuals in which their morphological and functional attributes act in an integrated form to maximize resource capture for restoring sward leaf area after defoliation (De Kroon et al ., ; Mori and Niinemets, ). Although the magnitude of plastic changes in plant traits is genetically and mechanically restricted, modifications in size, shape and/or rates of physiological processes play a central role in determining how fast plant communities adapt to a given disturbance (Mori and Niinemets, ). Adaptations at the plant population level are another way of adjusting to disturbances and have an important impact on regrowth, with variations in tiller number and size being commonly reported during sward recovery (Murphy and Briske, ; Valentine and Matthew, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Plant architecture is the result of the equilibrium between endogenous growth and environmental constraints and represents a critical whole‐plant adaptation (Barthélémy & Caraglio, 2007). Plants are modular organisms that grow by the repetition of basic functional units (i.e., buds, shoots and branches) (Harper, 1977), whose shape, size and number can show intraspecific variability in response to environmental factors (Barthélémy & Caraglio, 2007; Jarčuška & Milla, 2012; Mori & Niinemets, 2010). Notably, plants can respond to biotic and abiotic factors, altering their morphology, growth or reproductive pattern at the module level (Kawamura, 2010; She et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%